>>3420001 (pb)
YOU, my fren, are seriously based. Sad we'll never meet.
>>3415319 (pb)
Re: China's "Red October"
IMO, this magnetic drive tech is a waste of time. I mean, satellites could see magnetic field perturbations as small as a football field back in 1985. You know they're better than that, now. If we, too, are diving into this technology, I sure hope we've found a way to cloak magnetic fields from satellite and surface tech.
>>3419659 (pb)
>When people are full of shit they tend to talk way too much
You are astute at proving a point by your own actions. kek.
Well, I've never seen a post by Q with "]Mueller[", only "[Mueller]". What's dat meen?