Anonymous ID: 42c318 Oct. 10, 2018, 12:08 a.m. No.3421631   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1691

Anybody notice something here?

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/10/09/google-police-tone-not-content-good-censor/

 

Above links to an article on Breitbart, which goes into a leaked document from Google called "The Good Censor." Basically (if the docs are legit), the idea is to censor "tone" rather than content. As nice as that all sounds, "tone" is a completely subjective term, and afaic, a slantwise method to censor Conservatives.

 

People who prefer facts over feelings don't parse words over them. There are only so many times you can be told that something untrue is true before you lose it; there are only so many times I can explain that having a penis makes you a male before the gloves come off–one of the biggest reasons our society has flourished is that intelligent people aren't held back until the stupid people catch up.

Anonymous ID: 42c318 Oct. 10, 2018, 12:24 a.m. No.3421691   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3421631

Holy shit, Google listed this as one of the bad things that happened re: freedom of speech on the internet:

 

>"The conservative Free Brazil Movement used social media platforms to rally against an art exhibition called Queermuseu because it discussed homosexuality and paedophilia. The exhibit was eventually shut down, raising concerns about freedom of expression in digital spaces and the censorship of online/offline spaces in Brazil.

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/390521673/The-Good-Censor-GOOGLE-LEAK#from_embed