Some Anons really need to learn the difference between descriptive and prescriptive.
Cash for clunkers was about getting rid of cars that didn't have built in bugs and remote controls. How many poor people could afford to trade in their clunkers and buy new cars? But middle class people still had good cars that had lots of life on them.
Found the active Military Intelligence guy.
The question is… if that anon and that team are on the same side, where is the problem? Why would there be a problem? How would the team recognize what the anon is doing? After all, when you've been around a few military guys, it is easy to spot them in civvies. They have certain mannerisms they carry with them, even through their entire life.
As I said earlier, and now I will say it directly to you:
Learn the difference between descriptive and prescriptive
Let me put that another way. Describing something doesn't mean advocating for something.
But I will add one more thing. If you want to kill a few people, you use guns. If you want to kill hundreds, you use fire. If you want to kill tens of thousands, you use tennis balls and fishing line. (Literally, only those two things) You'll easily understand the first two. You won't understand the last one.
Very good anon!
Now, if I can just get people to recognize that just because I think something will happen, doesn't necessarily mean I want it to happen. Could use some tips and tricks on that one.
We aren't going to lose the House nor Senate. You would be surprised at the damage the Kavanaugh hearings did to the democrat base.
Tell th they also need to incorporate the wisdom from "Unintended Consequences" (especially if we still have functional LEOs), and from red team planner.
Kek!
Was that dude/company involved in necromancy? (From his perspective, not saying it's real.)