Anonymous ID: f6019b Oct. 10, 2018, 6:02 a.m. No.3422980   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3422945

Acknowledged, and thanks for updated dough baker. Blessings to you as well.

 

>>3422823

Yup. Well said.

>>3422894

Could be said for a good many of us right now. We've been made into selfish children by the cabal. The problem is you can't turn that around overnight. If Trump needs to make a promise (action A) in order to serve a larger agenda (action B), he'll do what needs doing. And when more of the plan is in place, he'll convince Iowans (and other wrong-headed but otherwise well-meaning ppl not seeing the big picture) that option B really is in their better interest, and they will willingly change their minds. If Ethanol is really a bad thing long term, Trump will get us to option B.

Anonymous ID: f6019b Oct. 10, 2018, 6:39 a.m. No.3423280   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3303 >>3353

Basket of deNotables

Still combing thru, have looked at all notable calls tho

#4339

>>3423102, >>3423266 AZAZ0909 Spec Ops flight landing at NAS Norfolk

>>3423228, >>3423208 Why does CNN think Nikki Haley "timed her exit perfectly?"

>>3422861, >>3422924 Michael (((Bloomberg))) registered ~~GOP~~ Dem, may run 2020

>>3422736 CNN Vid: HRC shillin' & shrillin', is saddened by 'whites' & 'white women'

>>3422965 Leaked Google Briefing Admits Abandonment of Free Speech for ‘Safety And Civility’

^^ Baker change ^^

>>3422886, >>3422899 New DJT (also, 55M followers reached)

>>3422798 Thirty-nine years timeline of Feinstein and China

>>3422829 WaPo still pushing hits on MBS/SA, several days running now

>>3422861 Michael Bloomberg re-registers as a Democrat

>>3422873 Turkey releases footage of “hit team” deployed against journalist Khashoggi

 

>>3423266

Good on ya, planefag.

Anonymous ID: f6019b Oct. 10, 2018, 6:51 a.m. No.3423373   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3392

>>3423303

I looked for the prev. post you said this post was a rebuttal to, but couldn't find.

Also, this Mueller debate has been going for a long time, and has been noted again and again. Because of that, you could say the prev. post has already been rebutted. For all these reasons, I'm not inclined to note, but would be open to it if add'l anons want it in there.

(also this:)

>>3423353

Thanks for looking out, anon