>>3423491 (pb)

>>3423466 (pb) “This storm is clearly engineered. It can easily be proven using NOAAs own weather sensors in the sea, as well as radar, which did not have it forming into a classic hurricane until this morning. wind speeds along it's path were not hurricane force until very very recently, and certainly not days ago when they started to report it. If you don't think this is weather warfare, you're really not that smart.”

So IF THAT IS TRUE, then by deduction you are also suggesting that Trump, Q and the military are FAILING in their most important duty, to protect the country and people against enemies who, BY YOUR CLAIM, are STILL ABLE to create that storm ATTACK ON THE PEOPLE AND COUNTRY, AND TRUMP, Q AND THE MILITARY CANNOT and/or FAILS TO STOP THEM.

So many “arguments” made and premises presented do not account for all the implications and logical questions associated the argument/premises being presented.

>>3423647

So now you are arguing that it may be good guys engineering the weather?

So that would suggest that said good guys are willing to toss all of the impacted people, homes, lives, finances……into the storm, literally? So those people and lives, etc. don’t matter as much as others? Those lifves, people and homes are expendable….for the plan?

Perhaps you should be one willing to flood your house and lose all your belongings instead? Or better yet, perhaps you should just give all of your stuff to the flood victims….to support the plan and all.

>>3423647

It’s quite easy to support sacrifice when someone else is making the sacrifice.

Keep supporting the plan and others’ sacrifices (because those are necessary for the plan). You are a fine, upstanding human being.

>>3423840

Actually, you are, though apparently you are not aware of if.

By presenting your theory, your assertion that the weather is engineered and warfare, indeed, you are arguing that concept.

However, you are trying to take mutually exclusive positions. But you can’t have it both ways.

IF your weather warfare theory is correct, then either the good guys or bad guys are engineering it according to your definition and claim.

IF it’s the bad guys, then Trump, Q and the military are failing their most important job, to defend and protect the people and country.

IF it’s the good guys, then Trump, Q and the military have deemed, decided, that those people and those lives are not as important as others, and they have been COMMANDED/ORDERED to endure the pain, suffering, damages and consequences……without their consent.

Like it or not, that is the situation you presented, but you do not seem to be able to defend your position, and instead try to claim impossible, mutually exclusive positions that absolve you of all responsibility for your claim…and the actions of those people part of your claim.

>>3423840

By the way, as a side note, you may wish to read the constitution and what is says about cruel and unusual punishment.

IF Trump, Q and the military are violating the constitution and doing so on American soil…..

What could that possibly mean?