>>3424344

>>3424359

Not much can be done. Even Q writes to, “think logically” and “question.”

But when reasoned/reasonable questions are posed, they either run away, turn a blind ey or use fallacies, especially ad hominem.

Further, Q appears to be rewarding and thus, training them to do this, creating more uneducated, “liberal mob” attack dogs who do not possess the necessary critical thinking skills.

Ask yourself, why would Q post asking the board if they are ready for arrests when none were on the ready?

What motives could one have to do that?

>>3424513

So ask, why does Q make posts, specifically like the one asking if ready for arrests?

Certainly posts like that (intentionally) generate energy, eagerness, expectations,….but also produce predictable results if suggestion does not materialize.

Why would anyone do that?

Think about it!

>>3424596

What was the point of your post? You replied to a comment directed at another, yet your response was a fallacy, a blatant exaggeration that did not provide any evidence, reasoning or credibility,

Why would someone do ^^ THAT? Are you able to see your own motives?

>>3424630

So how does pissing people off or making fun of them help and/or support the Q directive that they want you divided, or other of the emotion Q posts?

>>3424768

>>3424747

So are you suggesting that this is a government operation to train, teach, manipulate bots? Are you suggesting that Trump knows about This and is using people in a government, possibly even military program, but aren’t telling the people they are participating in the program?

Isn’t that what many seem to despise, the government doing things without the knowledge or consent of the governed?

True, no one is forced to participate in this image board, but shouldn’t it have a warning IF that was the situation as stated in your assertion?

>>3424779

Define what you mean. Prove your claim. Point out the shills, and prove it.

What is your criteria for determining such?

Why is it acceptable to use fallacies in place of logic, reasoning and critical thinking skills even though Q directs to use logic?

>>3424919

So, no, it’s not Q and Trump Admin who requested this platform?

So Q is not government? Yes or No?

If Q is government, his communication platform is part of government communications.

If Q is not government, Q is not part of Trump Admin.