>>3426269 (pb)

GMO is very different from the natural selection process you talk about. Plus we have CRSPR now, which is a very specific gene creation and splicing tool that can make very sophisticated whole gene changes. So now we have goats that make spider silk, for example, which is harvested from the milk for technical application. Goats making spider silk milk would never ever ever happen in the wild. We have glow in the dark animals, another mutation that would have never happened on its own. Pretty much anything you can imagine can be done.

>>3427030 (Pb)

There is still nothing I've been able to dig up that says any enemy combatants can be tried under military law. Foreign Enemy Combatants were/are held indefinitely at Gitmo right now (and in the past) by NOT charging them with a crime. Ditto for US Citizen Enemy Combatants. All the Laws I've found state that a citizen of the US may not be tried in military courts if US civilian courts are functional. Ex parte Milligan specifically addresses the issue and states trying any citizen in military courts while civilian courts are functional is unconstitutional.

The only Enemy Combatants that can be tried in our military courts are US military personnel, (including individuals attached to the US Military), and those deemed Enemy Combatants.

>>3427171

Correction:

The only Enemy Combatants that can be tried in our military courts are US military personnel, (including individuals attached to the US Military), and those military personnel* deemed Enemy Combatants.

Sauce:

Ex parte Milligan (1866)

https://www.britannica.com/event/Ex-Parte-Milligan

Johnson vs. Eisentrager (1950)

Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld (2004)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/542/507/

Hamdan vs. Rusfeld (2006)

https://www.britannica.com/event/Johnson-v-Eisentrager

>>3427311

Correction:

Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/05-184