>>3428851 lb
>Read moar.
Anon, with respect, it's difficult to read all pics and discern whether new info is being offered, especially during day time when bread moves fast and there's a shit ton of newfags reposting old news. If you've never baked, you might not appreciate how many things we have to keep tabs on. Trying to determine every post's significance, if not immediately apparent, is beyond one baker's time constraints, which is why we rely on the original poster or nominating anons to summarize it. In future, please put a brief description of the significance of your post at the time of posting, rather than waiting to post the explanation after the fact to baker as a grievance. The point is to work together as efficiently as possible, not to win petty arguments against each other.
For the record, baker was not responding to your original resignations post because it was not called out as "notable." I was responding to yet another repeat of the China espionage post. That particular nominated post merely circled that the Aviation co. was GM, info which had already been included in the first notable on the subject. It made no mention of resignations, nor did it provide any new info.