Anonymous ID: 7f30c6 Oct. 10, 2018, 4:50 p.m. No.3430700   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0799 >>1040

>>3430389

Ty baker! Looking good.

 

>>3430143 lb

To the anon that posted about the bad baker today, we don't want fuckery in the kitchen. If we have a shill baker censoring good notes and putting in shit ones, BO/BV should be informed so they can note his hash and inform outgoing bakers the next time he tries to bake. Most bakers will continue baking rather than handoff to a proven shill baker. But just bitching won't fix the problem, we need sauce and action. Could you please link to the post and bread # where your post was wrongly omitted by baker? You also said baker shits up the notes. Could you please post examples of this as well?

Ty for your diligence.

Anonymous ID: 7f30c6 Oct. 10, 2018, 5:08 p.m. No.3431040   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3430877, >>3430941, >>3430799, >>3430700

Yes, it does seem this should be an issue that should be discussed in Meta with BO/BV asap. I notice this particular complaint come up again and again. Better to settle it than to continue disruptive complaints in Research that don't solve the problem. Perhaps after the rally?