I asked a few threads ago for someone to explain Q's latest Timestamp demand to me.
Instead, I got irrelevant infographics that told me nothing about how to read Q's latest timestamps.
I suspect no one actually knows, because I haven't seen a cogent answer yet other than
>huuurr Q predicted this by a day.
The timestamps seem more like tea leaves than anything consistent and logical.
>>343798
UGH, not again with the crazy infographics. This doesn't help!
Piss off. You don't know the answer yourself, which is why you twist Q's words.
Otherwise, you'd just post the answer. But you can't, because despite your bravado, you don't know.
I'm trying to learn. Neck yourself, faggot.
Why are you telling me about POTUS tweets, when in THIS SPECIFIC INSTANCE THERE IS NO POTUS TWEET TO REFERENCE?!
NO ONE IS ANSWERING THE $#%^#$^#$ QUESTION.
STOP PRETENDING LIKE YOU HAVE AN ANSWER, WHEN YOU DON'T, ANONS.
#$^$#^#%^*