>>3432705 pb
>>3432781 pb
Not really.
It's better then porn.
If you want to talk discrediting?
Honestly it's a free speech site
All kind of shills post here.
What specifically do you object to about the "r" material
"It's bad for the movement"
You're not saying it's wrong, you're just saying to 'shut up"
So you shut up. &
Fuck off.
there was another shill thingy in Notables earlier in the day. But by the time I caught up it had rolled off the page.
The R stuff maybe be true, but it likely doesn't belong in Notables at this time; considering the present ethos of the anons who run the bread and Notables at this time.
"Notables" is too much drama.
Let it go.
The photograph evidence seems good.
And the fake death ruse is much more common than people believe.
Interesting if he bluffed the Bushes/ Scherffs into thinking he was dead/?
It's really called "the Next Person you meet in Heaven"
so you won't meet any more people until you see them in heaven?
They are very bold. dangerous.
I'm sticking with RR is dreck.
Fits with the data and evidence.
It's right in the open.
but it's so obvious people think
"there must be something more to it."
werd
yes, it could still be just that way.
If Rosenstein doesn't show up?
That's the pickle. He has no way out.
The doubt shillers must be really gunning hard.
It's all seemingly according to plan exactly.