So
I'm supposed to take the word of McCabe and Baker - 2 clear, unequivocal partisan hacks, one of which is certain, the other likely, to be under indictment?
Currently, as I understand it, Baker knows McCabe talked about [RR] wearing a wire, because he discussed it with Baker and Page. But Baker doesn't know what went on between McCabe and [RR].
To me it seems likely that it's a sham and an attempt at bringing as many down (particularly those who 'may' be actually helping Trump).
b/s.
I should have added I'm not a RR=white hat theory supporter either.
Is the tune true?
This comment supports my distrust of Baker far more than it does increase my trust of his and McCabe's word.
Besides, again, Baker does not have first hand knowledge of RR actually saything anything, much less being serious vs being sarcastic.
I can FAR easier picture RR saying 'So, I should wear a wire and try and get the sitting President - who already knows most of what is going on - to say something on tape to impeach him?' in a sarcastic manner than I can see him ever openly agreeing to do it.