>>3437434

>#DangerousDemocrats

Very catchy hashtag. #DangerousDims also.

Funny how Holder plays the foil to "Barrack's" good guy persona.

Not hard to think that little outburst of his wasn't discussed with VJ beforehand.

>THERE IS NOT A SINGLE DEMOCRAT DENCOUNCING THIS RHETORIC

There were a couple apologists on Inghram last night (the exchange with Bongino was classic) trying to equivicate their actions with the Tea Party in 2010.

Argument fell flat but doesn't mean they won't repeat over and over again.

>>3437441

Some memes to start to spread. Plenty of room for more.

>>3437842

not saying he did (lean on the 70% chance of murdered side), but if so,

because there was a contract out on his life?

http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/john-kennedy-jr-s-assassination-what-would-our-country-be-today-if-he-had-lived/

>>3438042

>>3438059

>there's something else regarding him they don't want us to see

see >>3438060 for a possibility for "something else"

>>3438062

my thought as well