>>3438106
The industry has been prepared to deal with the corn damage for 30 years. Entire product lines were designed to run on 85%, no?
You think a 5% increase in the name of FREEDOM will change that? (not concernfag here. I happen to like freedom).
My point is INFORMED is key. Lift the veil. Keep up the good work!
>>3437431
>That outs him as a genuine traitor. He's bringing the subject up and blaming both sides. He's a liar and a fraud. FUCK RAND PAUL.
HHT = 36 = Molech/Mare/I Am A Alien
FUCKRAND PAUL = 128 = Telling Stories
Molech Telling Stories
Mare Telling Stories
I Am A Alien Telling Stories
Choose One.
Plan truster here:
IMO this is good for energy like right-to-try is good for pharma.
opposition is legit, if untimely.
health freedom groups were first to be censored. know your audience. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a shill.
How can "ask questions, research, draw own conclusions" Be a prank, you logical non-shill?
Nice try.
NOT ABOUT WARMING.
It's about Power to the people. It always has been. They stop at nothing to prevent it.
They've stockpiled Health, Stealth, and Wealth, while we suffer with just enough to get by and keep them fed. If you think discussing this, and focusing ONLY on the INFORMED CONSENT aspect of it ("information belongs to the people and should always be free"),
THEN YOU ARE THE SHILL.
>Curious, what is your “carbon footprint”?
>Nothing in this universe is static.
>Cry me a fucking river.
Please sauce me saying ANYTHING about environment.
Energy/Farm shills are more than welcome to come support the plan, but lurk moar; illogical arguments will be exposed.
Care to talk about energy efficiency and suppression of technology through force?
Care to discuss the hidden science?
Can we get a Faraday in court over the issue?