>>3438124 pb
You seem to contradict the known loss of readership of the NYT and POTUS claims.
If NYT readership is in tank as claimed, then NYT cannot be “the world.” Or is potus wrong?
The fact that Questions are still unanswered and being asked suggests not knowing rather than your claim of knowing.
Your conclusion was not accurate.
For argument’s sake, let’s go with A. q is real.
However, your intro premises are rejected.
Not all are “shills” if questioning Q or posting faults in the claims and posts by Q or others. To claim such is to use a categorical fallacy absent of deductive reasoning and logical thinking, which happens to be a Q directive.
Q contradicts by asserting absolute trust in the plan, something that has not been seen and cannot be known by those expected to place blind trust in it. Blind trust is what put the country in the mess. Q directs questioning but illogical, uneducated and ill-informed posters take insult to such questions and react with use of one or more fallacies.
Thus, it is not as you claim, to “run off” or “derail,” but to question and find more accurate information to resolve any and all reasoned, reasonable questions.
Further, where did you get the specific number you cited, “10%”?
Did you pull it out of thin air or do you have any statistical data indicating such a claim?
Unfortunately, many do not appear to understand logic, reasoning and critical thinking skills.
Prove your point instead of making vague generalizations. Show where the logic was faulty and prove it. Learn to back up your arguments.