>You seem to contradict the known loss of readership of the NYT and POTUS claims.
Hmmm. How about the New York Post? AP? All other MSM, which reported the Qs?
You seem to be grasping at straws to maintain a belief despite evidence or reason.
If you want to think Q is a LARP, fine, but saying that his prediction that the world would learn of him in July unambiguously failed, is just not true.