>>3438476 (pb)
This is super concerning...
One of the major things I have hooked a few of my friends on is the sealed indictments thing. Nothing else would convince them about Q, but the sealed indictments thing was VERY compelling for them!
If what this is saying is true, that's a HUGE blow to the credibility of the Q movement...
This site shows that most of those court documents (like 90%+) are NOT indictments…
https://wmerthon6.wixsite.com/website-1/home/comprehensive-analysis-of-the-50k-sealed-indictment-claim
Do you have info that contradicts the arguments there?
Hehe, I noticed the same thing.
"Don't let that anon tell you how to think" he said, in effect telling the anon how to think…
That's a total cop-out.
I'm talking about DIRECT EVIDENCE.
He claims that there aren't only 1077 sealed indictments per year… that it's more like 25k. That should be easy to prove or disprove. NONE of that is in the fucking crumbs/drops, you stupid muppet… so your admonition to look in the drops is faggot.
I'm actually about to lay down the cash to do some pacer searches myself to INDEPENDENTLY verify this shit…