>>3439658

>>3439693

Have you looked at any of the say... last YEAR'S worth of posts and research?

This is EXACTLY in line with the Plan.

The Saudi scum and our relationship with them ended during the Saudi purge, which was almost to the day 1 month after the POTUS ass attempt at the Mandolay Bay (top 5 floors owned by guy who got owned during purge (he also owns 5% of Twitter, btw).

New Saudi guard NO ANGEL, but not OLD Saudi guard. Why do people insist on fighting the past? How does anyone win in fight against past? Address REAL CURRENT issues and speak logically and hypothetically from there. China is current threat. Attack by Dem Sen against this move is attack against Whitehat move by Blackhat. Paul response is likely Whitehat move against Blackhat attack.

SMDH

>>3439748

Why are we here?

"In recent days, Wikileaks has posted a series of puzzles to its 5.4 million followers. In a blog post today, it said this was “to encourage people to research these data centers in a fun and intriguing way.” WikiLeaks did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It remained unclear who authored the WikiLeaks blog post describing the Amazon release."

>>3439831

nonsense!

100% accuracy.

Even Q can't do that, though by design it must be that way.

>>3439880

Part of the plan.

Trust the plan.

Besides, are we not anons? Can we not discern for ourselves the information's validity? Are we really debating if the documents provided are real?

Is Wikileak's value Assange's opinions?

kek.

>>3439945

Might as well say Q was comped. (nothing changes if that's the case. All info is verified) Does it change the fact that the drops, (NOT THE OPINIONS) ARE 100% ACCURATE???