>>3439762

Something else the shills don't get.

Do you know Scott Greer?

Are you familiar with his work?

BIG Trump supporter. VERY smart. Great work.

His is a bit of an acquaintance. And you know what? He does not believe in Q.

Don't believe me? Ask him!

Come to think of it, Tucker Carlson doesn't, either. Neither does Ann Coulter. And Sean Hannity. And Bill Mitchell. A few links with #QANON hashtags, maybe they retweeted a few times, but no, none of them are on the Q Train.

In fact, NOBODY who has a reputation and name and who does work in the real world is 'on board' with Q. Certainly none of the experts, the people in the political world. And no politicians - not Lindsey Graham, not anybody.

Why is that?

Why is "Q" reserved for the plebs? Unknowns, nobodies with no public name or reputation?

Because it's a scheme and these smart people can see through it, but you can't.

>>3440296

Is that what it's about, "annihilating" Trump supporters who are skeptical of Q?

You can't offer reasonable proof.

Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof.

How about "Q+++" sent BEFORE the tweet where POTUS included "+++"?

Ooops! That was debunked. Looking at UTC and checking clock times, and checking the times embedded in the tweet metadata, Q's message came MUCH MUCH LATER. Not even MINUTES later. Look it up!

Do you feel tricked yet?

>>3440316

Sorry, Charlie.

Knowing who I am and seeing you accuse me of this proves to me what I already know: that the Q anon brainwashed and DECEIVED masses are in never never land and the butt of a very big joke.

I'm so sorry.

Meanwhile, think about what I said. Why isn't there a single Trump-supporting politician in on Q? Why isn't there a single Trump-supporting pundit in on Q? Why isn't there a single conservative media figure in on Q? From Matt Walsh to Michael Walsh, NONE of these people are for Q. Nobody.

>>3440373

Are you ready for PAIN?

Q is going to surprise you with something BIG before the weekend.

>>3440447

+++ lol

how about [0:00]?

another lol

how about the google books tripcode trick?

every 'proof' is debunked one by one

and the frosting on the cake:

50,000 indictments lol

the whole q phenomenon rests on this 'fact'

unfortunately, it's not a fact

the 50k number, built with data over a decade old, is simply untrue, wildly inaccurate, and not part of reality

so you are all waiting for NOTHING

there will be NO indictments

we have reached the point where trump will respond to Q at a press conference and completely deny it, and brainwashed kids on here will say "oh but look he made a q symbol with his left pinkie when he said it, he is speaking to US"