>>3439704 (pb)

I just racked up about $20 in charges on Pacer to verify some of this shit.

Iowa North, June 2015: 41 sealed documents

Iowa North, June 2018: 34 sealed documents

Reported on the "Sealed Indictments" PDF: 53

The 53 became 34 because I found that 19 of the ones that had been previously sealed had been somehow resolved, or unsealed, etc... in other words, there didn't seem to be any malicious intent to deceive, it's just old data.

But the notion that there's some sort of massive huge influx of new "sealed indictments" that is unprecedented just doesn't hold water.

>>3440151

Further digging…

January 1 to 30th, 2015: 36 sealed documents… did a new search for just CRIMINAL documents… zero.

January 1 to 30th, 2018: 104 sealed docs… 3 criminal.

>>3440185

Sorry, that last one was for Nevada…

>>3440191

I actually live in Omaha…

And I was trying to compare like to like…

https://wmerthon6.wixsite.com/website-1/home/comprehensive-analysis-of-the-50k-sealed-indictment-claim

See the above web page… it has northern Iowa as part of the check, so I was trying to validate that.

That one search cost me $7.40, because it was 74 pages… at 10 cents each… I had NO IDEA that would be so expensive at the time, and it really made me think twice about trying out a larger recordset like California… I don't have $100 to drop on this today.