>>3446616
>>3446639 both lb
just wanted to offer an explanation for what the first anon was talking about
Those who speak of the prison planet and "The One" and such which spoke of "the truth" from the perspective of someone supposedly within the bloodlines (guy from GLP) speaks of such things and claims something along the lines of
>once those who came to watch what happens soon will realize what they've done and experience a great deal of pain
you very explicitly reminded me of that here.
they seem to be under the impression some of us aren't exactly human, or aren't entirely human
although, these types of things pop up all of the time, and despite this one being a noticeably different amount of detail, they're often just used to distract or keep people from looking further for the truth
ew
firstly, monarchy happened for a reason
have you learned much of biology, anon?
there's a certain standard which persists throughout MANY sects of science.
one man, some long time ago, very concisely and eloquently put it:
>the strongest will survive
what better-knowing moron doesn't make use of such a paradigm?
we see politics as a macrocosm of social dynamics/structure, therefore, when compared to aquariums, gardens, farms, etc - it makes the most sense to allow someone who knows best, is the most competent, resourceful, device, etc., so a monarchy is to govern
think of capitalism - the people with the most money have it for a reason
unfortunately, like any great entrepreneur, their heredity eventually leads to failure
the problem with this is when the monarch dies: what happens then?
great question, as that's where a constitution comes in
there you have it - the government of the future - a constitutional monarchy
the enlightenment happened for a reason. most of the time, the fittest will simply assume control through whatever means necessary. i dunno, maybe we vote them in… who's to say? i'm certainly no political student
globalism was the tainted cure for such enlightenment
the next enlightenment - the Great Awakening, The Revelation, will put us a lot closer to where we were when we started.
we weren't supposed to be enlightened
too bad for them; the cat's out of the bag
anyway, this anon is a little too fantastical. this anon has too wide of a scope
but, they're great for spotting low conscientiousness and high obedience - perfect indicators of someone who can be manipulated to spook, glow, etc.
says a black man
not really relevant, just weird
not sure why he even mentioned they are white. doesn't really seem all that important
clearly he also agrees with the people he's speaking of
decrease amount of text
will confused normies
you did a good job with highlighting the important parts with making the text bigger
also, you have conflicting messages
are you going with
>you should really think for yourself
as per the first part
or are you going for
>mostly just sarcasm
as per the lower part
do one of those, not both
good idea to structure like this though
OPEN
BODY
CLOSE
that part you got right.
keep the Remember and the Vote XXXXX big (choose either convincing them to vote republican with rational thinking or use sarcasm to convince them to be stupid and vote democrat) and make the body small like you have it now
double post?
better, anon
take that to the meme room
they can help you more
i just lurk and help when i can
this one doesn't understand >>3447050
basically, as the other anon said, it was trauma splitting people all along
they weren't ever "schitzo" they just had what they would like to call what we know as trauma splitting "PTSD".
as George Carlin so elegantly puts it (see video)
the concept has evolved publicly all while the MK umbrella's experiments were conducted
they found many things
most of them, they don't reveal
the ones they do reveal, they do so through their mockingbird infiltrated psychiatry and mold their findings in such a way that should they be presented to us, we are only more confused and afraid
even the word "schizophrenia" itself has an anchor attached to it (now you're going to want to look up "Neural-Linguistic Programming" to see the explanation for what i just said)
i know you didn't speak of those things
i'm saying you reminded me of those things
>send brave volunteers to a planet
wtf kind of shit are you smoking? even if this is riddled with truth, you're getting way ahead of yourself here
sorry anon
you seem to have a narrow understanding of the timeline of things
check back once you come across information that suggests the length of the satanic cabal's influence over the vast majority of the world
also, Freud was an evil man who seems to have pleased his handler
there's a reason you hear MUCH less of Jung
we really shouldn't trust the emergence of "psychology" to begin with
but if we need to compare the two, this one's obvious
anyway, there's no reason not to separate the two of them.
anyway, one of today's greatest Jung proprietors and pupils, Jordan Peterson, has seemingly begun a transition back to a place for religion in the realm of psychology
he's a neat one to watch, if you really want to get in to today's psychology.
there is a lot of truth coming from this one, even if it's muddied.
and yet you didn't simply ask
>where are you going with this?
pardon my confusion in… answering the question you asked
tuck your self-esteem back in
this place doesn't call for emotion