>>3448359
>>3448338
>>3448517
>>3448685
>>3448385
Additional to the face comparisons, I have discovered evidence that I believe provides
an even better over-all convincing explanation for the ID existence of JFK Jr.
Have already dropped some teasers out there so far but, I don't want to spoil the party just yet!
Maybe I should ask Q if it 's O.K. to post un-cropped images (& when) - although there are
thousands upon thousands of posts in qresearch, if I'm on the right track I'm sure the
Q team knows specifically which one(s) I'm talking about - if this is the case would be
great if Q could respond & quote this post number & instruct accordingly! If no-one else has
detected my find or I don't ear from from Q for the moment am in his hands, maybe I'll reveal
a few days out from election.
When you see this expose it totally makes undeniable sense. I realise there's a lot of really
heavy stuff goin' down at the moment that the Q team need to concentrate on, but would it
be appreciated to know if this info to be helpful or otherwise (in which case if notified to hold
back,wouldn't reveal further).
Per the Vincent Fusca rally drops & the trolling of Avenatti (how good was that?!) to me they
obviously need everyone to believe in their own minds before the election - gotta be the
biggest RED PILL of all!. Then LATER on comes THE EVENT!! (Hence the onslaught from
shills - no wonder they're so desperate).
After years of being treated like mushrooms, by politicians/banks/pharma et al, we just want
THE TRUTH.
If I am wrong I will humbly accept correction and crawl back into my (rabbit) hole - as with
most anons, the flak we've copped trying to enlighten others, it's not as if we're not use to
a roasting (& I'm not I'm not even in the USA).
After all, this effort will affect us world-wide (MEGA!) & in Pepe's anon army I am just a meer
Tadpole.