>>3451245
They've lost touch with what democracy is. Will we have to teach them that, too?
Don't those shills get paid every time we react to them? Better to leave them alone. Or at the very least, don't give them a (you) when you do respond. (Don't link back.)
Anyway, given the video I linked in the last thread ( >>3451129 ), I think part of what we need to communicate in memes is methods of how emotions get manipulated and how not to get taken in. The "left" is falling for emotional arguments that have no basis in fact. Those who manipulate them are experts in pulling on heart strings. Movies and plays pull on heart strings, but they aren't real. And maybe even some stuff about where they're really going if they win? China is no model for humane society. If they don't like you, they send out a death van to dispatch with you and then probably sell the organs. A lot of these "spiritual" people who have fallen in with the left need to be reminded that China does not allow spiritual freedom. A major case in point for these New Age types would be the treatment of Falun Gong. (If you don't know what that is, look it up.) The left thinks they are heading for some kind of Nirvana, but they're being marketed a lie.
>https://bigleaguepolitics.com/exclusive-debbie-wasserman-schultz-terminated-two-bank-loans-on-day-imran-awan-gave-her-laptop-to-police/
Is there supposed to be a connection? Why would she get paid for releasing her laptop? This doesn't make sense to me. Or was it really a coincidence that she got paid on the same day? (And when will she be arrested?)
Which browser do you recommend?
I have to admit, it does kinda make him look like a good guy. Interesting way to cover his tracks.
Can't say that I've seen AIM pushing the R theory. I think they got duped on the Q stuff. (Wouldn't be difficult if they hadn't been following it closely.) But they seem to be on the right side of things. They've been wisely avoiding the Q stuff, since they're not convinced.
Then we need to pray for his protection. Shields of protection that any destructive device either reflects back to the sender or causes it to fall to the ground without effect, as God determines.
Had to be more than that on it to make her so desperate. Had to be about what she was getting paid for. My guess would be it had information about upcoming false flags. She looked rather chummy with the sheriff there. Connection with Parkland, perhaps?
Seems to be a list of Q's helpers, if you ask me. I see no problem with it.
Kind of a side issue anyway, albeit it would be a happy discovery, if true. There's a country to save.
>https://lovebreedsaccountability.com/2018/10/11/excellent-video-of-violent-liberals-mobs-the-media-who-defend-them/
It does make the point well. One thing that didn't seem quite right, though. The Constitution does allow free speech, but would "whenever and wherever" be accurate, as the one reporter in the clip suggested? It seems to me that there are some limits. You get to say what you want, but I don't think that gives people the right to barge into someone else's venue to do it.
It's the lack of tariffs that allowed our tech manufacturing to move to China. When in the marketplace and confronted with two items that are (outwardly) the same but one costs twice as much, which will people choose? Sure, the low price allows poorer people to buy. But if they had the job that went to China to make that item, they could have afforded the better one. Tariffs level the playing field to account for goods coming in that were made by the cheap labor of an unprotected workforce. They protect the rights of employees that we fought so hard for. After all, what good are employee rights if one is no longer an employee because the job left? As long as we are up against slave type labor, tariffs are needed to level that playing field in the market so that our own employees can have the rights and benefits that our society has deemed appropriate for them.