Anonymous ID: f8424d Oct. 13, 2018, 1:18 p.m. No.3466001   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3465967

if that'd happened pretty much anytime earlier this year (let's say between feb and aug, for ex), it'd be celebrated as a yuge win…

now there's so much win done and shills all around, a whole other light is shone on it

Anonymous ID: f8424d Oct. 13, 2018, 1:32 p.m. No.3466169   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6192 >>6325

>>3466142

that's a tough one… lots of narcissists and emotional vampires out there, who'll suck all your energy till you're dried out.

i guess there's an opening in there somewhere for "tough love"… they'll react violently when you won't indulge in their games, but maybe that's just what they need

Anonymous ID: f8424d Oct. 13, 2018, 1:34 p.m. No.3466187   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6274 >>6320

>>3466151

> it'd make an amazing summary chart for the archive.

well, maybe if the selection wasn't so random and half-assed…

maybe if it included actual valid posts and not whatever crap shills and spammers throw out

Anonymous ID: f8424d Oct. 13, 2018, 1:42 p.m. No.3466261   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3466192

i gave it a shot, but it's far from a final/complete answer… the question of how to be at least somewhat nice/show compassion to evil/fucked up people without getting fucked over remains, and it's not an easy one…

 

here's another idea: one chance a day.

you start each day with a blank slate for person x, reach out in some way (or just go about your regular interactions, depending) that gives them a choice, to be assholes or not, and if they blow it, you stop there/refuse to engage anymore…

start over next day…

(just an idea, it really depends on the people. it's great you're trying to be nice, but really, don't endure abuse)

Anonymous ID: f8424d Oct. 13, 2018, 1:49 p.m. No.3466316   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3466274

>what's a "valid post" anyway, anon?

it varies, depends on the post. if you can't discern/tell, not much i can do for you

>what would you prefer?

as i said, a better selection… i haven't perused our fren's work that much but everytime i looked it's mostly a jumble of waste. Sure, think i don't get it, i don't mind.

For a moment there started to be patterns, and attempts at an esthetic in the mix, and i was glad because that seemed to herald an evolution, that our montageanon was progressing… not so much today. Maybe it comes and goes.

>you don't post images anyway, right?

i often do, but that's besides the point

overall i just think it's a missed opportunity, the idea's not bad at all, i just find the execution lacking

Anonymous ID: f8424d Oct. 13, 2018, 1:59 p.m. No.3466406   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6433 >>6488 >>6489

>>3466353 , >>3466335

> It all started with this Rlarp back like 5 months ago

No.

It started months before, somewhere after the Jr drop:

 

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: a0205a No.952914 Apr 8 2018 13:15:14 (EST)

POTUS & JFK JR.

Relationship.

Plane crash 1999.

HRC Senate 2000.

The “Start.”

Enjoy the show.

Q

 

Many anons kicked around the idea that Jr would still be alive, and secretly part of Q & team's plan.

No need for R.

No need for Fusca.

 

But then the R larp jumped on it, and it's been shilled a lot, and used for MSM articles.

These days it's mostly anti-R shilling - just look at this bread, many anons jumping on it, reposting the same images all the time.

They get triggered with that like nothing else

Anonymous ID: f8424d Oct. 13, 2018, 2:04 p.m. No.3466468   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6597

>>3466433

> No real anon was suggesting jr was still alive, EVER.

and you know this with your magical all-anon knowing device, right?

I said "no need for R", "no need for Fusca".

By your - and their - standards, that kicks me out of the Rclub.

 

do you even know why you say "pelican", or you've seen us use the term?

Anonymous ID: f8424d Oct. 13, 2018, 2:17 p.m. No.3466599   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6616

>>3466586

yup, that's a pretty good example.

just keeping on conflating R with Jr

and attempting to mock anyone for not fully accepting the MSM theory that he is in fact dead (we just don't know for sure)