Lurkerfag. Give me a moment please.

Have just finished rereading all q posts chronologically for the third time today. I completely understand the future proves past/news concept. I also am grasping how to read the map. (I have a good grasp of the big picture up to this point)

What I am having trouble with is the stringers.

Do we have a running list of all stringers and of all those who have been checked and not? I searched op but couldn't seem to see anything.

These stringers need to be addressed at this point in my research and I'd love to know if we already have something to work with. If not its all good. I'll make one.

Thanks.

>>347495

I disagree. (Partially)

Some are for us.

Reread crumbs

Especially very early ones

Q instructed us to check them.

>>347513

Absolutely! Any chance you can sauce it? I'm not too techie and am hoping to save time.

>>347541

When Q tells us repeatedly that we have more than we know, well by power of deduction, I figured it could only be contained in the stringers.

They shouldn't be ignored anon.

Q gave an example of how to decipher them in his very early posts.