>>3472090

I use the duck duck go browser and never have any probs

>>3472108

19 does not have to only refer to one thing - you know how Q drops work

>>3472118

….and we forgot to remember that when research is being done, it muscles the shills out - research stopped here and what happened?

>>3472121

you don't have to follow this action, then - ignore it, it is no skin off your back if we go chase a rabbit down the wrong hole. we will figure out our error soon enough - if we err

>>3472126

crumbs change meaning as they age - but if this is nothing we will figure that out soon enough

>>3472129

you're good up there doing your thing

>>3472133

Shit. Hostages as insurance??

>>3472141

has to be something to it or there wouldn't be focus on it; it just isn't for everyone

>>3472149

i haven't shown any posts from Q with or without a time stamp

>>3472155

not following, sorry. saw the movie, didn't memorize lines

>>3472167

So do you think it was to a someONE or someONES -

i'm still stuck mentally on the 1000 pieces.

Bush: 1000 points of light…wasn't that determined to have been a sleeper cell reference at that time?

if now those are 1000 pieces, I don't think shattered I think 1000 pieces like silver pieces

or 1000 gold pieces?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thousand_Pieces_of_Gold_(film)

>>3472218

>>3472225

so 19 Lokis would not apply to hostages

>>3472233

ok, thanks. that puts that to rest for me then

>>3472249

ebot spews retarded shit. until he doesn't. and then look out

>>3472252

didn't lose. Awan was left to ripen, will be plucked at that time and not until

>>3472267

ok

>>3472272

ok

>>3472264

Oh - yes for that specific post about BLIND

i meant about

D

>>3472273

that's when he is just on 'idle' to me -

sometimes he just straight up talks

>>3472262

so in what way are they denied to enjoy if they win? I am not following this train of thought exactly

>>3472308

That makes sense.

Not sure where it fits with where we were going earlier - or is that the point?

Ok to no one in particular

Years ago the guy who helped me open my eyes kept referring to trogdolytes as having started all the shit and being key - but i wasn't ready to follow that train of thought and he was a bit vague - has anyone dug into that? I have a very tiny bit of knowledge but it's limited

>>3472329

Okay, so that takes us back to what the other anon said about the 19, correct? the 19 are known actors such as HRC, etc and not hostages, or are you headed somewhere else with it? I am trying to follow

>>3472359

Yes. And the whole 'say something, see something' that made some anons scoff. I got it at the time

>>3472374

giant humanoid robot