Back in the early days there used to be a resource site for the GA. In fact, for a long time it WAS the resource site. Then anons found that the programmer had done something to the site that was frowned upon. It's too technical for me. The best I could gather was he inserted some type of script that was a no-no. He had also added a button for donations, which I wasn't troubled by. I felt he worked hard building it so I didn't view it as a Paytriot type situation. It costs money to host a site and he wasn't requiring a donation to use it. After the brewhahah his site was no longer promoted here and another took it's place.

I have older hardware/software and that site was always user friendly to my system. I continued to use it. I made the calculated risk that I would expose myself to whatever everyone was screaming about. I quietly continued to use it since he was banished. That's months and months.

This morning when I clicked my browser gave me a bright red screen with a warning "deceptive site" and all sorts of stuff it could possibly do if I continued. Insert malware, steal passwords etc. It said the warning was based on my security settings.

Here's my point (and please don't guess as to the site, I'm not trying to promote it and I won't answer any question nor confirm any guess). Something affiliated with Firefox, I'm guessing, which is no longer even supported on my operating system, had to tweak the security database to include this site. It's never happened before…..for ANY site I have been to. I've had warnings that froze the redirect, but not the red screen with "deceptive site" warning. If it wasn't on Firefox, that's it's a legitimate warning that something has changed and is trying to prevent me from stumbling onto it. Therein lies the rub.

The reality is, to me at least, the vast majority of sites I visit all have potential problems, startiing with google, which we know steals as much shit as it can, saves your searches and the company sells the data too boot.

I'm taking today's warning as meaning it's another prong at trying to corral our "conspiracy" and limit as much exposure online as the cabal can limit. Perhaps I'm wrong, and will find out after I over-ride the warning, but again, it's always been the easiest for my computer to use.

I've been observing Q's silence, and the reported news of the last few days/weeks with interest. "It's all building up to something."

>>3473620

Odd, I don't recall 'Rory' chiming in when obama, the fraud, forced NASA's mandate to be one of:

Educating the World on Islamic contributions to science.' Boy, that had a lot to do with America's interest in space? Crickets.

>>3474021

There's one by a similar name who was a speechwriter for obama, the fraud and then there's the actor who, among other things, starred with Vince Vaughn on some famous movie.

>>3474030

Those are two different people. I was once confused too. Actor 1, speechwriter - the other 1

>>3474029

>>3474029

Guess it's safe to say Jamal wasn't a white hat. If Breenan's your buddy, you've been up to no good.

>>3474035

You are right! And what a contribution little tikki brought to school.

His dad got his ass handed to him by the courts when he tried suing the school and the police that handcuffed little tikki.

>>3474115

Well might be true IF I didn't spend all morning researching what he had done with the C_ia over the past twenty years.

Don't get me wrong, it's not like I wish harm on anyone, but when you're up to your neck promoting obama, the fraud, near-East policy, then it's fair that's fair game.

Care to enlighten me on what you know? Or too busy throwing misinformed memes?

>>3474115

Guessing you chose not answer my other reply. Too bad, was looking forward to hearing what, I'm most certain, would have been a well informed answer.

>>3474146

From what I've read he worked with the c_ia in Afghanistan/Pakistan during Soviet occupation but later sided with the destablizing near east policies of obama, the fraud.

It's at least safe to say he was more an intelligence asset than a journalist, which was his cover. That Brennan would scream loudest, only helps the arugment which side he was aligned with.

>>3474121

I really don't remember. I remember that Russian envoy that was shot by a (Turk?) former special forces guard.

He was shot at an art gallery, and the deceased was a close friend of Putin's. I remember that one but not the one of which you speak.

>>3474269

Call my old fashion, but I still prefer a more feminin look for my ladies…kek (pic -not- related).