Muh Craig Wright…
Muh Japan/Roger Ver…Muh US Citizenship…
Game on.
Happening.
structure. great now we have some real digging.
enough with loose connections trying to pump Bcash and Wright to a word with little connecting context to Q's post.
Stroika=Structure.
Try this for time travel. 8.8 miles/hour.
OWLs Everwhere!
>>3492373 main
Also,
Activities since Sept 27...
https://www.coindesk.com/sec-cftc-charge-bitcoin-futures-firm-1broker-with-securities-law-violations/
https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/1broker/
http://1broker.com/index.html
https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/cyber/information-on-1broker-com-seizure
September 27, 2018
Information on 1Broker.com Seizure
The 1Broker.com domain has been seized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in accordance with a seizure warrant issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981 and 982, for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (money laundering), 15 U.S.C. § 78ff (willfully operating as an unregistered broker/dealer of securities), and 7 U.S.C. § 13 (willfully operating as an unregistered futures commission merchant), upon a probable cause finding by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
dot IO
https://1broker.io/?c=en/home
https://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-futures-firm-1broker-moves-to-renew-trader-access-after-us-charges/
https://www.reddit.com/r/1Broker/
Finally, we’re happy to announce that tomorrow (17th October), we’ll be delivering the first part — a Crust Test that will allow you to use your home computer to discover and connect to others by testing hole punching in a real world setting — so that people can immediately get involved with the SAFE Network.
https://medium.com/safenetwork/safe-fleming-our-next-major-milestone-b4a191373f4a
One small calculation for a consensus algorithm, one giant leap for the decentralized web.
https://medium.com/@maidsafe/the-release-of-the-98c63ac43423
First field testing of the decentralized serverless internet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar_sign#Pillars_of_Hercules
A common hypothesis holds that the sign derives from the symbolic representation of the Pillars of Hercules – this representation can either have a banner separately around each pillar, or as in the Spanish coat of arms, a banner curling between them.
In 1492, Ferdinand II of Aragon adopted the symbol of the Pillars of Hercules and added the Latin warning Non plus ultra meaning "nothing further beyond", indicating "this is the end of the (known) world". But when Christopher Columbus came to America, the legend was changed to Plus ultra, meaning "further beyond". The Pillars of Hercules wrapped in a banner thus became a symbol of the New World. The link between this symbol and the dollar sign is more clearly seen in Spanish coins of the period - which show two pillars, each with a separate banner, rather than one banner spanning both pillars. In this example the right-hand pillar clearly resembles the dollar sign, and additionally directly relates to the use of money.
Spain's coat of arms
The symbol was adopted by Charles V and was part of his coat of arms representing Spain's American possessions. The symbol was later stamped on coins minted in gold and silver. The coin, also known as Spanish dollar, was the first global currency used in the entire world since the Spanish Empire was the first global Empire. These coins, depicting the pillars over two hemispheres and a small "S"-shaped ribbon around each, were spread throughout America, Europe and Asia. According to this, traders wrote signs that, instead of saying Spanish dollar (piece of eight, real de a ocho in Spanish or peso duro), had this symbol made by hand, and this in turn evolved into a simple S with two vertical bars. When the US gained their independence from Great Britain, they created the American dollar, but in its early decades they continued to use the Spanish dollar, which was more trusted in all markets.
The United States, even after independence, was still using the pound sterling as currency. This is attested in state legislation of the early 1780s, referring to pounds[1] and pence,[2] which predated the U.S. Constitution and federal legislation.
Given the origin of this theory – related to Spanish (and Portuguese) colonisation of the Americas – it is likely that the cifrão or peso signs share the same origin, and that the double stroke usage is merely a stylistic variant, rather than a distinct character.
"8 The Lord said to Moses, “Make a snake and put it up on a pole; anyone who is bitten can look at it and live.” 9 So Moses made a bronze snake and put it up on a pole. Then when anyone was bitten by a snake and looked at the bronze snake, they lived."
Old news, faggot. Calm down.
777, nice. Hadn't seen that yet.
https://medium.com/safenetwork/a-few-thoughts-from-web3-summit-2018-9966b184519d
See Chart.
Early adopters will get rewarded. Price will find dynamic equilibrium once fully adopted.
There are lots of scenarios. There could be a stable USD coin that the Treasury puts out and then cancels all debt to the FED and all loans to bad actors, while at the same time recouping trillions because of the Dec. 21 E.O.
Legit Cryptos could replace stablecoins/USD, but it could just be an add-on. They aren't mutually exclusive. Plus, some have utility beyond just payments.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/chinese-edition-of-book-mastering-bitcoin-appears-on-state-tv-with-sanitized-title
https://bitcoinist.com/bitcoin-permitted-law-china-court/
"Chinese court confirms Bitcoin protected by law. Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration ruled a case involving cryptos. Inside the verdict: CN law does not forbid owning & transferring bitcoin, which should be protected by law bc its property nature and economic value."
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/10/26/is-bitcoin-secretly-messing-with-the-midterms-221915
What's with the assumption that crypto and gold are mutually exclusive?
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-26/shall-we-add-little-lithium-water-supply
I think that's just called projection and externalization of the shadow.
“Where ‘IT’ was, there shall ‘I’ become.”
-
Freud
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_therapy
No need to invent spooks. Enough clowns around here anyway.
TAKESHITA
Tekashi69
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tekashi69-daniel-hernandez-gets-4-years-probation-child-sex-case-new-york-city-2018-10-26/
Ché, blocked.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-29/greyerz-china-just-took-delivery-massive-amount-gold-london-new-york
Eric King:
“Egon, they (the money managers for the elite in China) have virtually all of the high net worth clients into (physical) gold.”
Now why would we want to do anything to make gold go up? Gold bug rek.
Needed to roll up his sleeves? Or no A/C in Fort Knox?
No need to burn. How to catch a dangerous animal? Smoke them out.
These are CB transfers of gold. They think they will go to safe keeping. They' find that all they have are IOUs and a debt ledger of the treasury, i.e. no real assets and power ties cut.
REKT
Saar Wilf is a flat earth mossad propagandist. GTFO.
Seriously, shut the fuck up. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Say something intelligent that shows you've done your research or get the FUCK out. You have no business here except to slide. BLOCKED.
Looks like just another variation on a classic crypto scam. We've been through what in 10 years? 3-4 waves of this garbage?
If there's any relation to Q, it's only a hijacking attempt trying to profit off the momentum of the real thing. I'm not a BTC maximalist, but this type of stuff drives me in that direction.
Book of Matthew
Donald "John" Trump
Jair "Messiah" Bolsonaro (voting number "17")
God is Brazilian…
Brazilian banks just unblocked two Bitcoin exchanges' accounts at local banks yesterday.
What else?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lelalondon/2018/11/01/is-initiative-q-the-new-bitcoin/#9efee6f783fd
Libtard author. Careful who you follow. Cucked ass send me free money scam.
>If not, what's the fucking point of this?
Which are you?
Nothing else to do but MAGA.
TBL
English please.
https://medium.com/@pierrechevalier83/safe-and-solid-the-internet-as-it-should-be-5f9bdee42685
SAFE and Solid: the internet as it should be
In his talk: “An introduction to the Solid ecosystem” last weekend at Mozilla Festival 2018, Ruben Verborgh laid out very clearly the case for Solid as a tool to give people back their choice on the Web.
The talk was very accessible and inspirational, so I thought I would try and spread the message in blog format for those who couldn’t attend.
I am a member of the SAFE Network community. In the second part of this blogpost I share my personal opinion on the synergy that I see between the Solid project and the SAFE Network project to make the internet at the service of its users.
The vision
In the original vision for the internet, users would be empowered to access their own data or data that was shared with them at their own leisure. If they decided to share data with someone, only that person would have access to the data. A World Wide Web.
Somewhere along the way, the reality took a sharp turn away from the vision as a small number of large companies started to place themselves between different users of the internet to harvest the extremely invaluable resource that is user’s data. This led to today’s state of affair where the large majority of all data on the internet is stored in the datacenters of a handful of humoungously large companies which design their applications with two objectives: harvest as much data as possible; sell adds.
The Solid ecosystem enables the individual to use the apps they need, while storing their data wherever they want. They own their data, and share it with the apps and people they choose.
In today’s world, to make an app that is profitable; one must enter the data silo game or place advertisement from one of the internet giants, hence reinforcing their oligopoly. Given the headstart these companies have, it is nigh impossible to compete. This means that the apps ecosystem suffers from a sever lack of competition which limits innovation.
With Solid, some companies can sell data storage and other companies can develop applications. This enable application developpers to have one goal in mind: provide value to the users. The users can then pay a fair price for the value they received and don’t have to enter a contract whereby they give away every piece of data that’s dear to them for the purpose of analysis by robots that try and optimize their ability to get into one’s head to coerce one into buying so and so’s latest product. The price will be fair by necessity as any programmer who can provide better value will be able to enter the competition.
On the other side of the equation, some companies would sell access to servers. No data mining necessary: just plain and simple access to a computer in their datacenter. This computer would run the Solid server software and act as a data pod. These would also be able to compete fairly as a mountain of data wouldn’t be a prerequisite to profitability. In fact, the barrier to entry would be so low that technically savy individuals could decide to host their own data themselves.
Decentralization
“Decentralization” in Solid is not needing centralized platforms to enjoy the Web.
As everyone gets back control of their data, a completely new paradigm becomes possible: a single web application can access and display data from many different sources.
For instance, a news application could show an article hosted on the news outlet’s pod, display the writer’s profile hosted on the pod the author uses for their professional persona. Comments and likes on the article would be hosted in each different individual’s data pod.
This allows an unprecedented level of granularity in access granted to applications. A news application may access the information about which news articles I like and no other information about me.
Every piece of data can link to any other piece of data and the application is only a vessel to display meaningful relationships between different pieces of data. In other words, the fact that I liked a blogpost about Solid doesn’t belong to the blogging application. It belongs to me. I can grant access to that information to any application and they can display this information in the most meaningful way.
How does this even work?
The Solid project is not a company or organization. It is not just software. It is an ecosystem: a set of standards used to describe how different instances should cooperate. It is a movement: the mindset about the very essence of a web application is evolving. It is a community: people, companies and organizations are building Solid together.
1/3
Anyone can build or host software for Solid.
The Solid server acts as a data pod that stores and guards one’s data. The data pod is a regular Web server with support for access control and Linked Data (two new web standards that are part of the Solid ecosystem).
The Solid data pod is application agnostic. Any application can be built using data from any data pod. All application specific logic resides in clients.
A typical data pod can contain any data an individual creates or needs online: user profile, photos, comments, likes, blogposts… The list goes on.
Solid clients are browser or native apps that read from or write to user’s data pod.
Users can choose very precisely what part of their data pod any application can access.
Who’s behind it?
Solid started as a MIT project lead by Tim Berners-Lee. Its development is now accelerated by the newly created startup: Inrupt.
Taking it to the next level: SAFE and Solid?
David Irvine, inventor of the SAFE Network and Tim Berners-Lee, co-inventor of the world wide web and head of the Solid project at the Decentralized Web Summit 2018.
I am convinced of the potential Solid has to disrupt the established order of the internet by enabling application developers to materialize their vision without having to compete with corporate giants on who can gather the most data and mine it most efficiently.
A Solid internet would align the incentives of web developers and users for the first time since the very early days of the internet.
The point in this vision that I think can still be improved on is the pod:
There are two possible ways to store one’s data in a pod:
The user may be sufficiently technologically savy to run and administrate their own server, with appropriate measures to ensure data security from theft or loss. This is a task that only a small elite will have the competence to undertake.
Alternatively they must delegate this task to a pod provider. They must then place their trust in a company. That is they must trust the company’s competence and good intentions.
Enter the SAFE Network, a protocol to store any data on a secure and distributed peer-to-peer network. Data on the SAFE Network is split into chunks that are distributed onto a network of people’s computer. Each chunk is encrypted and stored in multiple locations to make data-loss practically impossible. No trust is necessary as the encryption key for a user’s data never leaves this user’s computer. Unlike traditional peer-to-peer networks, no identifiable information is shared as peers only know of other peers through an opaque identifier.
Using the SAFE Network as a store for user’s and company’s data, one could replace Solid servers with a serverless, trustless autonomous network. This would make data security a first class feature of the Solid vision.
When will the web be SAFE and Solid?
Solid is still in early stages of development, with an implementation of the Solid server and a small number of applications being already available. Progress of the project can be followed on their website: https://solid.inrupt.com/how-it-works
The SAFE Network is currently in alpha stages of development with still a significant amount of work ahead of it. The progress can be followed here: https://safenetwork.tech/timeline/
Both projects have already proved the viability of their vision through protocols and working code that have been released and developed in the open over the last 12 years for the SAFE Network and 5 years for Solid.
Communication between the projects has accelerated over the last year, culminating in a proof-of-concept social network on the SAFE Network using RDF, a standard from the Solid movement.
Re-inventing the internet is no small feat, so a significant amount of engineering is still required before the vision can be fully realized. Individuals of any level of knowledge and skills can find ways to help either project get closer to their vision.
Both communities have discussion forums where they welcome newcomers: https://forum.solidproject.org/ and https://safenetforum.org/
Join us in creating an internet by the people, for the people!
Sorry, just needed 2/3.
Satoshi Nakasone
https://hublot-a.akamaihd.net/hds/2881164053001/201811/2881164053001_5857706987001_5857707021001.mp4
https://contractfortheweb.org/
https://www.cnet.com/news/tim-berners-lee-unveils-contract-to-protect-and-strengthen-the-web/
https://www.cryptoglobe.com/latest/2018/11/is-initiative-q-a-scam/
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-08/left-organizes-response-events-900-cities-protest-firing-jeff-sessions
previous post made in error. fyi.
Let the best product win. It's about the long game, not some get rich filecoin reverse-engineering shillery. I've done my due diligence. Have you?
No. It's about the best technical solution to a decentralized serverless internet. Yes, SAFE is still in development, but the difficult parts have been overcome and demonstrated. They don't want to put something into the wild that isn't perfect cause it's pandora's box. once it's loose…
On the other hand, Filecoin was a great idea. IPFS is a great idea. They're having to reverse enginneer everything though now because its a bunch of hipster millenials that didn't understand all the details. They're making sacrifices now on the best ideas to ones that are mediocre. It was THEM that thought about money first. It works…so does ethereum or EOS. You can save your shillporn on dtube or steemit or whatever. Go for it. Best tech, best long term solution, best deep thinking about what a real decentralized network the world needs…SAFE. the rest is just marginal experiments that I support. they are dangerous as investments, but i support the tech.
Future prove past.
We've got a live one here!
Just outed themselves as a shill.
And yes, women wear women's clothes. You're a genius!
Something SAFE has which IPFS doesn't and to which it can't even hold a candle: TBL. Is SOLID to be discounted because it's not ready?
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2018/11/bitcoin-btc-the-significance-of-10-and-2018-rise-of-the-phoenix/
interesting…
A distraction.
I've done my due diligence. I've formed my opinion. Could I be wrong? Yes. Is my opinion well-informed by research and education? Yes. Am I willing to change my opinion if the facts change? Yes. Do I see likelyhood that the facts will change? No, hell no.
Not shitcoins are free, but all free money is shit.
Good luck.
Valuable perspective.
Sucks that this anon claims to have filtered me. Their choice not to engage with opposing ideas, I suppose. Angrily defending Initiative Q and staunch Bcash maximalist doesn't make someone necessarily glow, but it does make them of questionable ability to analyze projects in crypto.
>Not shitcoins are free, but all free money is shit.
Phonefagging. Meant to say "not all shitcoins are free, but all free money is shit."
Blockchain is one, perhaps the first, instance of a distributed consensus mechanism. It is not mature enough to be the answer at the moment, but if you understand the mathematical game theory behind it, you realize that it's a huge leap in human technology. Perhaps there will be other variations and evolution, but Pandora's box has been opened. There are certainly lots of experiments out there, but very few are an order of magnitude beyond what Bitcoin accomplished.
As for the internet, it's not an impediment. What is your beef to think it is? Electricity? With meshnets, wireless charging, and other marginal technologies, connectivity and electricity won't be barriers. IMHO, to think that they are displays a lack of knowledge about the available technologies and a lack of vision of human ingenuity. It's like being one of the naysayers about the potential of the internet in 1995. Look of Clifford Stoll. Very smart tech genius. Completely wrong about the future. Pessimism kills.
https://www.newsweek.com/clifford-stoll-why-web-wont-be-nirvana-185306
As for the encryption, there are lots of algos, lots of innovation, quantum algorithms. It's not my area of expertise, but I've follow many for whom it is. It's basically a non-issue, and many with understand about how quantum computers actually work will say that quantum cryptographic algos aren't even necessary. There is a lot to say on encryption, like just pausing the system and updating the algo if there was ever an attack. Lots of contingency planning can be put into effect and the smartest minds in the world are already thinking about it and putting those ideas into the code before it becomes an issue.
Inheritance? The US military with nuclear launch codes, banks, and tech businesses have all kinds of schemes for key management. https://thirdkey.solutions/individuals/ for example is a law firm which has Andreas Antonopolous on their payroll to consult on trusts, estate planning, and key management for cryptocurrencies. These solutions are coming. I don't see a completely decentralized libertarian future. That is not smart, safe, or efficient. We have to work together. It will be distributed, not decentralized at the human solution level. It will be better than central banks and giant companies, but there will be companies that help with multi-signature solutions for any scenario that you can dream up. Google it. There are already lots of companies in the space.
Crypto isn't a complete solution, so I think the devil's advocate is overplayed.
SAFEnet solves the EMP vector, for example. Each place might have issues if hardware is destroyed, but the redundancy across the network maintains data integrity at 99% or more even if the whole country went out. Likely, if that happened, currency or data integrity or hardware is the least of one's worries. Decentralized serverless autonomous networks will run circles around the current internet and the attack vectors you suppose. Still thinking linearly. This is permissionless innovation. Governments will be just another user, not dictating code. Very difficult in the least.
I lived 1/3 of my life in "3rd world" countries. I understand the challenges for connectivity. I also understand the challenges of sound money in many of those places. What's the opportunity cost for them? Maybe crypto isn't great for now if you hold an SDR basket currency like USD, but for others? Crypto doesn't have to be the street currency either. It only has to back it. Derivative notes can be printed as physical representations just like gold and silver certificates.
Supermicro was about current hardware backdoors. Likely easily knowable, but human corruption involved. Technical solutions can be had. Purism is a company that is building completely open sourced devices. They'®e 98-99% there. Their devices are a few years behind in terms of asthetics, but they are lightyears ahead in terms of transparency. Can we trust them? I'm not an expert in hardware, but it's a developing area that few know about and pushes back against the onslaught of pessimism you display. The only part that isn't yet are 1 or 2 core intel firmware in the core. That's likely what the NSA and the Israeli's are using. There is a huge movement to end it. It could be a question of time. Think Joe Sullivan at Cloudflare.
I'm not interested in sharing child porn. I honestly think that if privacy rights are protected through effective encryption, then the vast majority of good guys would be able to work together and fend off the bad actors without resorting to having to crack the comms. Moreover, a society that protects rights and freedoms and doesn't undermine the money is going to have a large indirect impact culturally by producing more communities and people that aren't prone to criminal activity of such caliber.
It doesn't matter if you can crack Bitcoin's encryption in the future, if there is a threat, the mining community can update long before that threat evolves. You can go back and then try to crack a hash many blocks ago using the old algo, but good luck doing that for all the post-transaction blocks to convince all the miner's you have the longest chain.
I would agree that there has to be an element of human trust networks, like a semantic web or connection-based identity. A mixture is going to be more resilient than one or the other, human/physical or digital. Even if Bitcoin just grows to account for 5% of the world's reserves, it will have done it's job by being a sound money check on the system. The transactions that are worth being done in crypto can be done and if 5% of the world's money gets destroyed by a theoretical EMP, then so be it. The opportunity cost compared to this fiat regime is worth in my opinion.
SAFE destroys any ability to remote snoop. It crushes so many attack vectors. All that I know of. Physical access to put in a software keylogger or a built-in hardware backdoor is still an issue, but these things are being worked on. No one here is the first to ask the question. And I've seen SO MUCH work being done on these questions. People have been working on them for years. The solutions already exist. It's simply a question of collaboration and the demand consciousness for it to happen.
What is the Q movement if not a seeded shift in the direction of collective consciousness? I'm confident that we aren't going back to the gold standard and traveler's checks. We need to go back to concepts from the past, but not necessarily the same technical solutions and implementations. The future will rhyme and the negativity around crypto for this or that reason just seems much more of an anachronistic fear of change and evolution than an accurate account of reality. Yes, there are risks, and things should move only as fast as they need to. Introducing a new asset class that could come to either be included in the monetary base basket or even potentially act as the basis for value in the shift from the petrodolar to the datacrypto is not something to be taken lightly. Dismiss it and ignore it has a horny teenager's momentary fascination at your own peril.
What ever happened to "because the ones who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones that do"?
Very interesting, though I think Leah unconscious cabal. If you listen to her comments over months, she pumps Perkins Coie, socialist identity B.S., etc. but I like tone and Tyler. Fyi, Tyler's fund was Lucid Investments or something…sounds like Lucis or something…you can follow that dig if you want. Anyway, the whole crypto space is at a critical point for a few days.
This is the most subtly nudging post.
"Only high IQ follow BCH Darth Vader strategy." Too many subtle fallacies to list. If you're being honest and not trying to shill, you'll either have to stop jumping to conclusions or lay out the argument better rationally for everyone. To me, it just seems you are either shilling for BTC or crypto dowsing through the ethereal collective mind-body unconsciousness at best.
I find Roger to be a bad actor. Just my instinct. I don't really care if Craig is Satoshi, though I doubt it. One theory though, whether he is or isn't, is that he could be trolling the whole ecosystem of Bitcoin forks as a way to divide and keep the fight away from BTC. I have no evidence to provide for it. Just presenting it as a theory. Craig is certainly the evil genius type that could be capable of lots of paths. At a minimum, I find it strange that for years he would rip on centralization and government, but now, instead of pushing the technology further, he seems to be pumping the idea that getting governments to adopt by allowing some centralization of the actual network is key to the next stage of growth. That just seems antithetical to his being…but then again, who knows what is true about Craig. He is a bit of an enigma and a charlatan at the same time.
Assange's insurance files?
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/donald-trump-attorney-general-matthew-whitaker-time-travel-x-cryptocurrency-bitcoin-world-patent-a8635496.html
https://bitcoinist.com/off-line-bitcoin-transactions-now-a-reality/
Thanks for the explanation. Better isn't only defined by the best technology. TCP/IP wasn't the best nor were a lot of the early tech companies that survived. First-mover's advantage is underestimated, and SAFE has the earliest advantage of them all. However, it is also a much more comprehensive protocol that has more to do with data than with monetary things.
6:47 = 17
And the 118th prime.
Magical Number Wizardry
They definitely designed a game. Perhaps even colluding to divide. Fuck Roger and Wu Jihan and Craig. I'll take Szabo or any original and honest cypherpunk deep thinker any day over those shills. BTC dominates the intellectual brain trust in Crypto. Craig is much smarter and more experienced than most in BCH, but he's a con artist. Did we even see the core teams between ABC and SV? They look like inbred inepts.
I'm interested as to why you think Segwit is a negative or why the lightning network is bad. There are huge balance of power tradeoffs with on chain scaling. To me, blockchain in general as a distributed consensus mechanism is shit for scaling. Maybe future iterations will come up with something better, but building a stack makes a hell of a lot more sense than on chain scaling. We don't try to write stocks into gold. It doesn't even make sense. Bad analogy, I know.
The Parsec protocol with SAFE is pretty genius. That whole project takes a lot of work to understand for most in the crypto space. It willl just keep pushing forward. It's still nascent though.
Interesting perspectives on Ver. All important considerations. ABC, the "Alpha(bet)" chain…
As for Craig, still a douche.
These guys are either greedy as hell or their doing a psyop to divert the greedy followers who make problems away from BTC. They just keep finding wedges and exploit them. It's of little cost to such big hodlers and it provides the service of diversion for BTC to thrive and get shit done. Very art of war -esque.
"I've believed lately that Bitcoin Core was a false flag. It's all just games."
Say more…
Looks ad-libbed…
A good example of what alt-coin experiments are for then. They're testing grounds, not replacements. 5 algos? Sounds like Myriadcoin… totally unnecessary. Lipstick on a pig.
https://forum.solidproject.org/t/best-practices-for-ownership-in-social/609/5
There are so many charlatan projects marketing all kinds of unnecessary over-the-top bells and whistles while fundraising absurd amounts through unprecedented access to unsophisticated investors. I'm not going to beat around the bush. 99% of crypto is a bullshit scam and they shouldn't even have the perception of a soapbox to spew their greed-whoring.
What? Are you going to bring identity politics into crypto? But…but…but…muh tiny inactive shitcoin community says their new widget is the "next big thing".
GTFO.
https://web.archive.org/web/20070202231434/http://wiki.castlecops.com:80/CastleCops