>>4007318

you would get ahead of the curve with a few ounces of gold.

or silver… especially if silver were to return to it's historical ratio. depends on the ratio they decide to go with.

a return to 15:1 historical ratio would be excellent for silver holders.

there was a time when a house could be purchased for 500oz of silver (yes, these were smaller homes… but let's use it as an example)

the revaluation of gold to non-maniputed / true values will be key in the reset of currencies worldwide (and the backing of these currencies)

>>4008125

>>4008219 (ty anon)

the 1:1 swap from fiat to the rv'd asset backed dollar makes it fair…. as long as long as the money being swapped has a proven providence… the policing of this transition is the key

>>4008125

the middle class is getting fucked by using a fiat dollar… over-inflated in value… constantly depreciating in value.

when the currency becomes sovereign… trusted… asset backed… then everyone owns gold.