Anonymous ID: 3abc80 Oct. 14, 2018, 11:58 a.m. No.3475427   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5502

Posting for feedback…

 

On Q drop 373. Been curious about that No. 175.

 

Trying to connect it somewhere. What if No. 175 pertains to Pg. 175 of the OIG Report? Sally Yates has some interesting comments there. Context spills over to pg. 176. Verifies what Q has been saying all along.

 

She says on pg. 175:

 

“Jim, I thought we had talked about it in the last meeting… That we were all going to hold hands and jump off the bridge together. Because that’s kind of how I kind of viewed this was that this was going to be a tough thing here. A lot of people were not going to like our decision but that’s our job. And that we were all going to, you know, we were all going to stand together. We were going to announce it together.”

 

Spilling over onto pg 176 that "jumping off together" is repeated again. Apparently agents didn't think there would be criminal charges against HRC, and that they would all announce it together. Comey took it all on himself. Other names are mentioned, McCabe, Rybicki, Lynch, etc. Apparently they weren't even alking to that bridge with Yates as they don't recall anything.

 

The point is, this verifies what Q has said on multiple occasions. It does no good taking out part of the core evil-doers. All must be rooted out.

 

James Comey, et alia, have an entirely different definition of Rule of Law and ethics than what we might appreciate under an origianlist reading of the reading of the Constitution. We saw that in the hearings for Justice Kavanaugh.

 

BTW, Trisha Anderson was head of General Counsel Office, and worked closely with Peter Stzrok. She also clerked for Elena Kagan. Her husband was a top WH official for Obama, and she contributed to his campaign. Kevin Clinesmith and Sally Moyer also worked in General Counsel.

 

https://westvirginia.forums.rivals.com/threads/kevin-clinesmith-and-sally-moyer-need-their-own-thread.176179/

Anonymous ID: 3abc80 Oct. 14, 2018, 12:36 p.m. No.3475748   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5784

>>3475686

 

I don't mean to be ignorant, but is it possible that PP is a FF group? By that I mean do they deliberately set them selves up for confrontations such as this? I don't know how to read them out.

 

It doesn't seem right. "Let us pray so we can go punch our fellow man." Something like that.