>>376307

BV, with all due respect, YOU deleted posts that were legit

Are you a clown?

I vetted the research on my own. I have only posted here ONCE before but monitor very closely to see how close all true Anons are getting. Q has opened up so many eyes. Those of us in CI (on the good side) are cheering ALL ANONS on. BUT, YOU deleted posts yesterday that were so close to truth that it really makes me wonder what your motive is. I only assume you have been the one banning people and deleting other legitimate posts.Your activity is questionable. You can ban and delete ME/THIS but then how do you think it will be perceived?

Point being, I KNOW that YOU don't know who Q is. You don't know what is 'legit' or not from Anons. I have seen posts deleted over the last week that are closer to accurate than some that YOU think are.

YOUR perception isn't the rule of law. If Anons live under one bubble of what is considered accurate then what is the point in the research? That is pure Mockingbird.

Intelligent Anons are questioning the compromise of this board.

>>396280

That is the job of a MOD/ADMIN. Some Anons drop great research in the wrong place. No need to delete. Someone copy and paste the contents of the drop and put it where it goes so it can be researched and reviewed.

We can't go one and all if we can't see what Anons are posting.