>>347952
What good is any of this you're doing if you fail to influence anyone? What good is any of this if all anyone sees is hate? What good is any of this if it CONVEYS hate? Isn't that what we're fighting? We are up against an evil cabal who have no regard for the value of life. But what I am seeing going on here has no regard for the value of life, either. If you can't convey a better way, why are you even here? Isn't that what you're about? Because that's what I'm about.
You're making a lot of assumptions there. You don't even know who I am or where I come from.
Yes. Thank you for this. That's what I've been trying to say. These gently positive things work because they touch on COMMON concerns. They don't insult the reader. They focus on facts and what is really happening out there. None of what this Anon shared are personal digs into anyone. It's deeds and issues, not personalities.
OK, so what are YOU trying to do here? My take on the work was that we were to 1) influence people to understand why things are going to go down the way they will go down and ACCEPT it, and 2) perhaps find a bit of actionable intel along the way (though apparently they have it all already anyway). Which leaves influencing people. You're here why?
Centrist. But seriously. Why are you here? Clown?
Search capabilities on the board are crappy. Your best bet is to keep track of which threads you posted in and search for "(You)".
Yes, you're right about that. But sometimes I do only have a post number and NOT a link, as happens when posts disappear from threads and they must be searched out in the archives.
Yes, we talked about that today at the conference. Only now are we getting back on track. This country would have been a very different place, had JFK succeeded.
Hard to say. We've been lied to a lot. But what I do know is that a couple friends checked into Facebook and said they were sicker than any other time in their life. One of those for sure had just taken the flu shot.
Agreed. The Constitution we have now is good. A convention risks scrapping everything good about it, especially if it's the cabal participating. We can't even be sure of who would be allowed in.
You'd be surprised how much clearer things become when context of these posts is isolated and shown in a single stream. I have learned a lot collating everything that way. Or when I do tagging, which I need more of. I start tagging stuff, and it starts coming together. Only in the past week have I had good tools to tag things easily. (I create my own tools.)
References to 8ch and qresearch are automatically redacted when I create posts. Links are pretty much dead. But there's enough left of them that people from here can use them. They'd be no good to someone who doesn't know about here, though.
I imagine even after the drama is over, I'll still be working on it for a while to get it to be what I dreamed for it. If anything else, it should provide a good history of it all.
Maybe, but she's got some sort of congressional immunity. The rest of us? Investigators will be on our doorstep in no time. Do NOT do or say anything that could be considered a threat to a sitting member of any government body. It's generally not a good idea in any case. That's what the justice system is (supposed to be) for.