Word. We've actually been mocking their asses all week for failing to get us to agree to their bullshit.
-t. "muh arrests, muh inaction, let's revolt" shill mocker.
kek, I've not received a safe but scary message.
But I still disagree with them. I've seen enough shit here in the trenches to know that POTUS and the Patriots are the real deal.
Is voting a right, or a responsibility?
If you don't vote, are you supporting MAGA?
If your candidate loses, and you didn't vote, are you an idiot for bitching?
Personal responsibility starts with you. Or would you prefer to kick the can down the road and blame others, again?
This safe and scary message is quite intriguing.
IF it can only happen on the new, more comped cellphones I'm SOL, though, I've got a potato ;p
Welcome to the last 10 - 15 years.
You're just noticing it now because it doesn't like uppity slaves getting strong and noticing shit.
That's what the clintons and obama were doing.
I agree with your assessment. Massive projection.
>You know Trump has a ton of shit to drop on these fucks right before election.
>Honestly if he didn't I would start to question his leadership.
Just remember, NOTHING LEGAL can happen until after 11/6.
As a matter of fact, I'm reposting this again to pre-empt any muh inaction shills; It’s a useful reminder to those of us who are more than TIRED of WAITING.
There will be NO ARRESTS before the ELECTION (11/6/2018), at least from Jeff Sessions/DOJ. There CANNOT BE ARRESTS, prosecutions, or unsealed indictments right before the ELECTION by DOJ or its constituent parts.
The Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 7321-26) would prohibit the timing of arrests to affect an election.
Specifically, 5 U.S.C. § 7323(a)(1) holds that “[A]n employee may not use his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election.”
There would be no doubt that, say, arresting Crooked Hillary this week or next week would be the use of official authority to affect the result of an election. There is no way Sessions would even risk creating the appearance of impropriety, let alone commit an outright violation of the Hatch Act.
The BIG DAY, to the extent there will be one, is further off than we (or at least I) would want.
What will probably (continue to) happen is that information will (continue to) drip out through CONGRESS, which can leak non-public information to affect the election, provided that the leak is itself not unlawful. For example, how was it learned that Crooked Hillary’s security clearance was yanked? Grassley.
For those of us who aren’t sure how much longer we can wait, buckle up for the long haul (a week seems like an eternity to me, knowing what I know).
IMPORTANT CAVEAT: Pursuant to 5 U.S. Code § 7322(1), none of this analysis applies to the following: (1) POTUS; (2) VPOTUS; and (3) “a member of the uniformed services.” That means that POTUS is free to DECLAS whenever he wants, and to the extent there are or will be military tribunals, they can happen whenever without abridging the Hatch Act.
Sauce:
// https://www.justice.gov/jmd/government-ethics-outline
// https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7323
Thank you to OP for sharing this
>I HAVE NEVER NOT EVEN ONCE NEEDED A PRO ATHLETE
or a professional politician for that matter.
>Is Hillary running for something? No.
This is true… But:
>So which election is so fucking entangled with Hillary that she can't be arrested because it would be interference?
Any election the DNC is involved in, including the upcoming mid-terms. She controls the DNC. And you know damn well they will claim political motivations if arrests were to take place, now; [they're] already doing that without arrests!
>Are all politicians above the law for the window of time around every election?
Yes. That's why the Hatch Act is a thing.
>Is soros just a US citizen or does he still have his citizenship from Hungry…
I'm pretty sure the big criminals do not obey laws, just like the little crims.
You know, you're only helping us know which topics [you] hate us to talk about, so we can learn why the globalists are afraid of it, right?
Because ten years ago the Democrats loved ethanol. Now they hate it, because Trump wants it?
No other reason? Sad.
What happened to change that?
What really happened to change that?
You guys suck at memeing that bad.
Is she even aware the she just brazenly declared that her shit goes back 500 - 900 years?
Pocahontas my ass. She's full of shit.
-t. descended from the 1770's Hessians ;p
I'm feeling this way too. It's much better to arrest a crooked pol after the protections the Hatch Act provides expires for the cycle though.
Less wiggle room for [them].
Shadilay :)
Bernie is damaged goods.
He threw the nomination to Hills in a deal, remember?
If they run him, they auto-lose.