CIA Democrats.

http://www.greanvillepost.com/2018/03/07/the-cia-democrats/

Extracts

CNN’s “State of the Union” program on March 4 included a profile of Jones as one of many female candidates seeking nomination as a Democrat in Tuesday’s primary in Texas. The network described her discreetly as a “career civil servant.” However, the Jones for Congress website positively shouts about her role as a spy, noting that after graduating from college, “Gina entered the US Air Force as an intelligence officer, where she deployed to Iraq and served under the US military’s ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy” (the last phrase signaling to those interested in such matters that Jones is gay).

“It is notable that those candidates with a record in the military-intelligence apparatus, as well as civilian work for the State Department, Pentagon or National Security Council, do not hide their involvement, particularly in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They clearly regard working as a CIA agent in Baghdad, an Army special ops assassin in Afghanistan, or a planner for drone missile warfare in the White House or Pentagon as a star on their résumé, rather than something to conceal…”

The total of such candidates for the Democratic nomination in the 102 districts is 218. Each has a website that gives biographical details, which we have collected and reviewed for this report. It is notable that those candidates with a record in the military-intelligence apparatus, as well as civilian work for the State Department, Pentagon or National Security Council, do not hide their involvement, particularly in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They clearly regard working as a CIA agent in Baghdad, an Army special ops assassin in Afghanistan, or a planner for drone missile warfare in the White House or Pentagon as a star on their résumé, rather than something to conceal.

One quarter of all the Democratic challengers in competitive House districts have military-intelligence, State Department or NSC backgrounds. This is by far the largest subcategory of Democratic candidates. National security operatives (56) outnumber state and local government officials (45), lawyers (34), corporate executives, businessmen and wealthy individuals (30) and other professionals (18) among the candidates for Democratic congressional nominations.

Of the 102 primary elections to choose the Democratic nominees in these competitive districts, 43 involve candidates with a military-intelligence or State Department background, with 11 districts having two such candidates, and one district having three. In the majority of contests, the military-intelligence candidates seem likely to win the Democratic nomination, and, if the Democrats win in the general election, would enter Congress as new members of the House of Representatives.

What could possibly go wrong, electing State Department I.C. Operatives.?

Who is their Queen, who still pulls their strings?

CIA Democrat Candidates.

Why does it matter?

Where does their primary loyalty lie; the CIA or the USA?

I think we know the answer.

Ex State Department Democrat Candidates, have to be Clinton candidates; their loyalty is to her, not you, and not the USA.

The CIA Democrats

..An extraordinary number of former intelligence and military operatives from the CIA, Pentagon, National Security Council and State Department are seeking nomination as Democratic candidates for Congress in the 2018 midterm elections. The potential influx of military-intelligence personnel into the legislature has no precedent in US political history.

Articles continued here: www.wsws.org…

Why it matters, a blogger's take;

This pretty much sums up for me the democrats outright admission to election tampering and rigging. Now they will be flush with individuals highly trained in subversion and disinformation. They are the company they keep.

It also fortells of difficulties on the horizon for Trump's long term agenda. The hard left has been beat at every single turn in their attempts to subvert a duly elected POTUS by rigging the election primaries, supplant disinformation everywhere, falsify court documents, lie to FISA courts, create mythical people, politicize children, import votes via illegal immigrants, illegally rule against federal laws, and the list goes on.

This is yet another attempt to supplant operatives hell bent on carrying the torch of the extreme left to enslave the American public even more than we already are.

Excerpt from Part 3 of the article:

Source: www.wsws.org…

Note this;

The final category of military-intelligence candidates consists of veterans of the US State Department during the Obama years, most of them former aides to Hillary Clinton. These are among the best financed and most publicized of the likely Democratic nominees. In the event of a Democratic “wave” in November, most would find themselves with seats in Congress.

Good luck dems…you're done.