Anons, I want to shoot an idea to everyone and tell me whether it's gay or not.

I'll start off with a rhetorical question, would normies care if Hillary was found guilty of treason?

My answer is no because it would be another political crime that can be easily spun, and or ignored.

BUT–If the Q team would release the HRC video (or any other incriminating evidence), that goes outside the boundaries of politics, I think that would do the most damage.

In my mind, I think the only way to truly take Hillary down, is to show Americans a non political crime committed by HRC.

>>3489046

The only reason I asked, in all sincerity, is that the kids I talk to at my City College (I'm in school for nursing), is they don't give a rats ass about whether Hillary is guilty of treason.

I've tried expressing to them the myriad of treasonous activity HRC and Obama have done but their eyes just glaze over.

>>3489082

"There's nothing more to "prove", the evidence is already there."

I see what you're saying, and I mostly agree but I just wanted to emphasize that even though I know the evidence is already sitting there waiting to be exposed….

What I'm saying is that it'll still be a political crime that the liberal nuts will deny.

Which is why I'm saying release the HRC video because that crime isn't political and your average normie would be forced to consider the insidious act they just witnessed.

I know this isn't a "chat room" so I'll stop replying…thanks for for your reply my man!