>>3490886 (lb)
>I am not very good at building proofs
Um, you kinda just did, your sparked almonds spark almonds, that's how its done. & you got this anon thinking...
If their plan was for NK (proxy sponsored by [CHINA]) was to remain a threat post POTUS win 2016, then when would be the time to have NK launch (at the US or an "ally")? Threaten to launch right before midterms to suspend election (11.3?), on election day (11.6) as a safeguard in case they saw a loss coming, or right after midterms (11.11 marker?) if they lost, as an insurance policy? Either one gave them leverage. Once NK was resolved (freed from [CHINA] & [CLOWNS] & [MOS?]), they couldn't play that card, thus the tech companies had to step it up. Loud mouthpieces had to step it up as well, and [MSM], of course, has increased attacks. In doing so, all 3 groups have exposed themselves or who they are, dems, "allies", all of (((them))). Take a punk's gun away & all you have left is the crying punk.
And imagine, ALL OF THE ABOVE WAS SPONSORED BY....[CHINA]...living right next door to NK (proxy), who would launch at their command, in coordination which the NAT SEC threats w/in our own government, gladly accepting yuan as payment to #WalkAway from America.
>“A clean [H]ouse is very important.”