>>3498287 pb
>>3498145 pb
https://youtu.be/gdAadTjoT3U
Notice the cut at 6 seconds
Who was filming the black van going around the corner?
Alright it's tricky
"she" appears to get out of a van that did not crash.
The one who we see is a double?
The car that crashed is out of shot after the cut, to the left.
Whoever put it together wants you to think, if you weren't looking closely, that after the cut, it was different camera angle?
Taken with a view toward the back of the van that crashed?
However it's not.
Look at the grating of the building at the left straight ahead in both shots. Some design with white lights coming through from inside the bld.
It's the same in both.
Therefore the "Hillary" who got out of the 2nd black van was probably in that van, driving behind the front black van that hit the pole while making a left turn.
Probably a security detail with a double?
Whoever crashed the van is around the corner, and would not be coming from a direction straight ahead.
It wasn't done well. So I think the splicing of the film/shots was done ad hoc.
Maybe they didn't want her to appear on camera drunk?
Also without security clearance does that effect her security detail?
Notice how the car coming up from behind goes straight ahead after the accident?
Who was the blond with the HRC style haircut wearing a knit dress who we see walk in front of the probably double and get into the car the probably double just exited?
Could this have been staged?
Could there have been some kind of hand-off here?
Who was the camera person. What happened to the real footage?
Could HRC be in trouble for claiming in public on a network show that all that is left for the Dems is to up the ante with "strength?"
Is that incitement to riot?
Could that be interpreted as a call to overthrow the government?
"That 's all they respect" or somesuch, she said.
It was announced she was striped of security clearance.
Does that make her vulnerable to what are likely to be her many enemies?
Bread is going fast. Feels like old times.