Anonymous ID: 608d4c Oct. 16, 2018, 5:02 p.m. No.3501697   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3501633

Sure, have a few studiesโ€ฆ

www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/3/833/pdf

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209363/

http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/66/8_Supplement/1084.1

https://www.drugscience.org/Petition/C3D.html

Anonymous ID: 608d4c Oct. 16, 2018, 5:10 p.m. No.3501774   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1807 >>1833

>>3501691

Anons made headlines today while Q's been absent, yet anons are discouraged?

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/10/16/what-is-the-npc-meme-liberals-rage-at-cartoons-mocking-their-scripted-thoughts/

 

I think not. We're doing just fine on our own (and quite honestly, anons were doing just before Q consolidated our individual efforts). The majority of the "discouraged" are shills. Learn the difference.