>>3500966 (lb)
Are you serious? Ground cables wouldn't protect airplanes in a cat 5 hurricane. The ground cables would be all that remained. I didn't say storm surge took away the plane, I was just describing the power of a cat 5 hurricane. Let's say the plane survived the storm. Do you think the windshield did? What would hours of rain, wind, and debris do to the cockpit?
People can still give shit testimony, though.
I saw that, but it could be disinfo meant to seem as if it were truth. Meaning, Bin Laden may be hiding out in AZ with McCain, but Iran is accused. So next, war with Iran. Also, bin Laden didn't bring down the WTC, the CIA, Bush, Israel, et al did. So, when will True Pundit report that?
Yeah except oftentimes, the prosecutors are Soros flunkies. So they act tough for optics, but in circumstances that affect the cabal, they suddenly have the need to grant immunity, strike plea deals, drop charges, etc.
According to Q, a plane hit the Pentagon. Can't refute that! Thus, planes must have hit the WTC and brought it down as the official narrative explained.
Same poor excuses. Do soldiers think about that when signing up to fight the CIA created Al Qaeda and ISIS?
Yes, otherwise I cannot consider Q being more than deep state. I always support Trump, since very early in the primaries, but Q? Eh, not so sure.
Stab me now with progressive laws.
Discussed by everyone but Q
What a way to dispute a massive psyop! By using forced semantics that appeal to "conspiracy theorists" while maintaining the official story!
I've also noted that those who jumped on my 9-11 Q comments have 20+ posts