>>3508780 (lb)
>the plane
Doesn't Lady Trump fly AF1?
AF1, or ANY administration aircraft having mechanical issues just doesn't sit well on the spoop meter.
>Q has gone silent, possibly on orders from NCA not to reveal anything new so close to the midterms.
This would make sense. [They] are casting around for any excuse to inhibit the organic consensus that is solidifyling country-wide.
This is when [they] will be the most reckless.
Actually, the Patriots are getting you to repost it for them.. And it all makes logical, ''legal'' sense.
Because anons understand very well that [They] are ''legalistsic'' and will not follow rules, while at the same time bitching about other people not following rules.
The reason why it's taking so long is because everything is being doine by the book, ''so you traitors cannot wiggle out of it.''
>compromising the optics of the board
This has been going on since the beginning. It appears [they've] shifted to straight up traducement and slander, knowing we will beat them with facts, Every Single. Time..
[They] could never meme.
-t. wrote >2322789
>But I know you mean the plane she was on obviously is in the fleet of superior government aircraft. But Obongo had eight years to put hazards on the planes. Also there are hidden Satanist everywhere and they are desperate to do something….anything to change the narrative that is coming.
Exactly. The administration planes are maintained around the clock, to far higher standards than commercial airlines.
I'm calling fuckery.
Awesome, let's dig on Rhode Island's shady governor (and senator whitehouse also) now.. New England was hit very hard by [them] for our role in 1775-1776.
Remember the Gaspee. The og Tea Partiers were late to the party ;p
Correction: The burning of th Gaspee happen in 1772, not 1775.
sauce:
http://www.gaspee.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaspee_Affair
>honestly, even /pol/ never had this much shit-image posting as Qresearch does now.
That's because /pol/ has long since been knocked over by virtue of the mods all being clowns already.
What you are really stating, whether you choose to accept it or not, is that this place is under massive attack, all the time.
And the reason for that is because ''We are on target''.
It's why [they've] ''always tried so hard to change our comms (ie- the bread format). Because it fucking ''works.
>Perhaps it's time to execute the Military option.
I'll leave this here for you..
This is a repost; It’s a useful reminder to those of us who are more than TIRED of WAITING.
There will be NO ARRESTS before the ELECTION (11/6/2018), at least from Jeff Sessions/DOJ. There CANNOT BE ARRESTS, prosecutions, or unsealed indictments right before the ELECTION by DOJ or its constituent parts.
The Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 7321-26) would prohibit the timing of arrests to affect an election.
Specifically, 5 U.S.C. § 7323(a)(1) holds that “[A]n employee may not use his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election.”
There would be no doubt that, say, arresting Crooked Hillary this week or next week would be the use of official authority to affect the result of an election. There is no way Sessions would even risk creating the appearance of impropriety, let alone commit an outright violation of the Hatch Act.
The BIG DAY, to the extent there will be one, is further off than we (or at least I) would want.
What will probably (continue to) happen is that information will (continue to) drip out through CONGRESS, which can leak non-public information to affect the election, provided that the leak is itself not unlawful. For example, how was it learned that Crooked Hillary’s security clearance was yanked? Grassley.
For those of us who aren’t sure how much longer we can wait, buckle up for the long haul (a week seems like an eternity to me, knowing what I know).
IMPORTANT CAVEAT: Pursuant to 5 U.S. Code § 7322(1), none of this analysis applies to the following: (1) POTUS; (2) VPOTUS; and (3) “a member of the uniformed services.” That means that POTUS is free to DECLAS whenever he wants, and to the extent there are or will be military tribunals, they can happen whenever without abridging the Hatch Act.
Sauce:
// https://www.justice.gov/jmd/government-ethics-outline
// https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7323
yeah, whatever they will come out with will not even remotely resemble our drafts. There were several floating around when anons were debating it.
Their past track record with that kind of thing speaks for itself.
I don't think any Patriot would go to that as option A; That would be option Z.
I think the only way that would be possible is if you started seeing mass casualtie events at the polls.
I believe that would be the ''only'' thing that would trigger what you suggest.