Anonymous ID: 1083de Jan. 13, 2018, 5:13 a.m. No.35376   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5385 >>5401

>>35369

 

So, how to redpill this to people.

 

The ones ive seen talking about it outside the board are all claiming its linked to trump (dont ask how, i have no idea) and/or "nothing to do will Uranium 1, besides Tenex, but thats just a single word supposed connecting the two"

 

People are waking up, but some dont seem to want to swallow what we give them.

Anonymous ID: 1083de Jan. 13, 2018, 5:27 a.m. No.35415   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5500

>>35401

 

Ive been trying to figure out just this. Was tempted to 'fake' some newssite that would rewrite the stuff we found (granted, a few breads back) and twist it somehow, people want and villain/hero situation, the current "villain" for vanilla normies is trump, an idea would be to somehow spin Q drops "agianst" trump to spread the information. Switching out key people. (ex: Clinton foundation 'helped' in Haiti = Trump foundation 'helped' in Haiti). And have a source that would link to the actual happening instead of the 'fake' headline. Vanilla ultra normies would instantly share it (like they do with anything anti-trump) but would actually technically be sharing info supporting ongoing Q research to 'Vanilla with sauce' normies who actually look into the sources.

 

It may backfire in that sense and make people follow the wrong track. But its a idea that could atleast help spread the message.

Anonymous ID: 1083de Jan. 13, 2018, 5:55 a.m. No.35547   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5574

>>35500

 

I Think the reasons the digs on Trump works is because people dont like him. It doesn't matter that its supposed to be funny or anything, its a dig at him, so it works.

 

Kinda like "Ofcourse Trump called Haiti a shithole! Chealsy took the money for a dress!" Wont work, because its a direct dig on the clinton family. What WOULD work, would be switching the names. and put the target on trump, Even though its not true.

 

I know we want to keep flack off him, but vanilla normies wont bite on anything thats even supposedly pro-trump (even the jobs and stockmarket stuff is "bad" according to them).

 

Continuing the thought, (sorry if im repeating what you're saying. Im quite tired) would be to reverse the train of thought. The idea being making memes with Republican backdrops, but Clinton facts.

 

Eg: 'A picture of Trump laughing' Top: I told them the foundation would donate money to Haiti.

 

Bottom: But i stuffed X% into my pocket instead.

 

(and a tiny bottom source, maybe a tinyurl, linking to the Clinton foundation and the lack of money going there)

 

This forces vanilla normies to believe Trump is doing something bad, but soft-redpilling people on the info that a supposed charity is stealing money.

 

Something like that WOULD work, and its akin to the shittier memes that the left uses.