>>35500
I Think the reasons the digs on Trump works is because people dont like him. It doesn't matter that its supposed to be funny or anything, its a dig at him, so it works.
Kinda like "Ofcourse Trump called Haiti a shithole! Chealsy took the money for a dress!" Wont work, because its a direct dig on the clinton family. What WOULD work, would be switching the names. and put the target on trump, Even though its not true.
I know we want to keep flack off him, but vanilla normies wont bite on anything thats even supposedly pro-trump (even the jobs and stockmarket stuff is "bad" according to them).
Continuing the thought, (sorry if im repeating what you're saying. Im quite tired) would be to reverse the train of thought. The idea being making memes with Republican backdrops, but Clinton facts.
Eg: 'A picture of Trump laughing' Top: I told them the foundation would donate money to Haiti.
Bottom: But i stuffed X% into my pocket instead.
(and a tiny bottom source, maybe a tinyurl, linking to the Clinton foundation and the lack of money going there)
This forces vanilla normies to believe Trump is doing something bad, but soft-redpilling people on the info that a supposed charity is stealing money.
Something like that WOULD work, and its akin to the shittier memes that the left uses.