Anons,

The Delta between Q' markers an POTUS' tweets is what's relevant.

Not between POTUS' tweets themselves.

Re-read the crumbs.

>>35458

Whatever it is, it's not [0].

>>35466

>Q has pointed to timestamp differences in Trumps posts.

No. they haven't. Pay attention.

>>35477

Yes, Delta is the time difference between Q's markers and POTUS' tweets. Not between POTUS' tweets themselves.

>>35473

It's not hard to sat if you've read Q. This is not the clock. Has no bearing on the clock. Not how it works.

>>35515

POTUS fixed the tweet one minute after Q posted DEFCON marker. How can you misinterpret that? Some if us have been doing this for months. We know how it works. Clock is based on Delta between Q marker + POTUS tweet. Period.

>>35521

Analyse all you want, it's NOT what Q told us. Re-read the crumbs.

>>35527

You are dead wrong. Re-read the crumbs. We follow Q's lead, not yours.

Newfags trying to change the Q clock system - it won't work.

Follow the system Q laid out or fuck off.

[0] will been when Q and POTUS tweet simultaneously.

It's been figured out, confirmed, re-confirmed by Q

over and over again.

>>35610

The DEFCON post is the Q post you utter fuccking moron. We've been through this already with the other markers. We know what the clock is already. This bullshit idea does not float And you are fucking filtered you braindead fuck.

>>35610

Wrong. [1] was also between Q and POTUS. Between the DEFCON post (by Q) and the corrected tweet with "consequential" (by POTUS.) How is that so hard to understand?

>>35676

One already been removed.

[0] is when Q posts and POTUS tweets at the same time, (Delta = 0.)

Stop messing with Q's long-established clock system.

>>35743

What Q showed us last week was the difference between the DEFCON post by Q and the "consequential" post by POTUS. Not sure how you could miss that. It's not the first marker we've correlated. There is not more than one possibility. This system was set up by Q months ago.

>>35755

What Q showed us last time was the difference between the DEFCON post by Q and the "consequential" post by POTUS. Not sure how you could miss that. It's not the first marker we've correlated. There is not more than one possibility. This system was set up by Q months ago.

>>35797

The one about human rights and human trafficking? We talked about it a lot when it happened.

>>35812

Irrelevant. Q's clock is based on the time difference between Q posts containing a marker and the corresponding tweet by POTUS.

>>35813

No, Q is saying the revised tweet was [1] minute after Q's DEFCON post. The timestamps are there for all to see. Could not be clearer.

This is to train you how to understand the correlation between posts and Tweets.

BETWEEN POSTS AND TWEETS.

Pay fucking attention, anons.

Same shills who are trying to fuck up Q's clock system are the ones saying Q is posting here all day as anon.

Filter them and stay focused.

>>35887

Don't let them derail you. Clock has always been based on time differences between Q posts and POTUS tweets. Q made this crystal clear. Disregard anyone not following instructions.

>>35905

That's from a year ago ffs.

>>35924

You're just making stuff up now.

Follow the crumbs from Q, ignore those who directly contradict them.

>>35926

This is irrelevant nonsense. Never said by Q.

Directly contradicts Q. Ignore it. Re-read the crumbs.