Morning Anons,

trying to work on the clock thing, came across this one from >>29979. Don't see any hands in the clocks though.

Also saw this here >>28288 -- so would that be what would come out (incl. hands on clock) for the [15] marker ?

>>35434

>>35439

Thanks. Is that confirmed ? Because for the [15] for example, wouldn't I have to go 15 mins from Q's post to find DJT's message ?

That'd be 22:20, no ?

>>35467

So would that be more correct then: >>35435 (Tweet in PST, it's 3 hrs later in EST) ?

>>35477

You think that Anon >>28288 described how to do it correctly ?

>>35527

How have you determined that ?

>>35499

>>35526

Only wondering if we'd have to solve something before the "puzzle" can be continued ?

Clocks & signatures appear to be the most feasible things to solve as of now.

>>35590

There were two chess games I believe, where the pictured position had occurred.

>>35648

A clock for [15] would then have to have the time of Q's marker (i.e. marker [15]) and the time of Trump's tweet ?

>>35160

For the clockAnons using the pastebin with time differences (Tweets/Q posts) in the batter:

There are two new versions extended up to [60] mins diff, in case minutes on the clock play a role more than alphabet code.

GMT: pastebin.com/zD4dPEAC

EST: pastebin.com/r981JZPx

>>35798

In the right pic, the [10] marker, was either in 12/15/2017

qarchives.ml/images/8pol/11045246.PNG

or in 12/18/2017

qarchives.ml/images/8cbts/121327.PNG

Tweet & Q post are from 12/12/2017, which would be going back in time. Not sure, hadn't that been rules out ?

>>35880

You can replay two of the games with that position games here:

(1918) chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1095025

(1997) 365chess.com/view_game.php?g=1137038