https:// www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-13/facebook-s-sandberg-twitter-s-dorsey-to-depart-disney-board

>>35436

>trying to work on the clock thing, came across th

>>35440

>>35454

There's a LOT more destruction before the 1000 years of peace. LOL What about the rise of the anti-christ first??

>>35461

That one could be wrong. But It's an example of clocks.

Heres' the other version i did

>>35475

The great delusion, and the great reveal are ON NOW.

>>35477

TRUMP JUST POSTED A [0] MINUTE DELTA.

>>35499

NO, no they are not. I am pretty sure they are directly between Trump tweets. I am clock anon, and based on my analysis, there are markers that are deltas between Trump tweets.

>>35499

Q post, TRUMP DELTA, both [15].. NOT BOTH ARE VALID. I have determined the TWEET DELTA is the correct delta, not the Q/Trump Delta.

>>35530

I don't agree. as Clock anon, upon detailed look at timestamps, the timestamps appear to be between trump tweets. ALSO the DELTA [1] WAS ONE MINUTE BETWEEN EDITS OF TRUMP TWEETS.

>>35542

OK… You are aware there were different types of markers, right?

>>35548

>>35562

>>35560

Exactly. I just read the Q post, that states deltas are between TRUMP TWEETS .

FUCKING PEOPLE ARE FUCKING RETARDS.

The deltas, are between Trump Tweets.. It's quite obvious.

>>35575

>>35580

>>35583

Good WHEN [win]

Meaning, a trump tweet, followed by [15] then a GOODWIN

>>35594

Show me the relavant post, or GTFO. The graphic I presented clearly showed Q talking strait deltas between POTUS tweets. NOTHING to do with Q posts. Please show proof, or fuck off

>>35602

REREAD FROM Q FUCKO

>>35606

Not ONCE does it say DELTA FROM Q POSTS.

All deltas are POTUS TO POTUS

>>35617

THE DELTA IS THE TIMESTAMPS FOR THE EDIT YOU UTTER FUCKING MORON .

>>35625

>>35625

FUCK the graphic is wrong, but Q even said it. You're a fucking idiot. I'm not getting into this with idiots. REREAD WHAT Q SAID. Please show me where it says the DELTA IS BETWEEN Q POSTS AND POTUS.

Please, because most deltas are between POTUS posts.

>>35606

>>35625

>>35617

>>35633

>>35633

DEFCON [1] Posted here.

POTUS mods tweet [1] MINUTE BETWEEN.

>>35637

>DEFCON [1] Posted here.

That is NOT to say that the markers posted here are not valid, they are, but the deltas are ENTIRELY PUBLIC. What value would linking to Q posts on this forum do for the general public? If a countdown could be documented using POTUS tweets, well now you have a useful tool…

>>35644

>>35606

Read the linked Q post. Show me where in that post it says to reference deltas to Q posts. Go please.

>>35654

The correlation between Q posts, and the twitter deltas, not between them. Get it???

>>35661

The edit occurred with a [1] You obviously have reading comprehension. I was here, I believe that's a mistake, and is even covered in the screenshot I shared. The delta for the edit was between trump post/edit.

POTUS MODS TWEET [1] MINUTE BETWEEN.

That's the fucking delta.

>>35678

>>35690

>trump tweeted 2 tweets at the same time again

Must be a fucking coincidence… LOL

>>35696

Here's a question, has he EVER DONE THAT BEFORE DURING THIS CYCLE? Or is this zero delta thingy for TRUMP new.

If so, it verifies the theory that the deltas are between POTUS tweets.

>>35700

>eted twice in the same minute before today?

Fuck before Christmas. I have a Jan 7th explanation post for the deltas, I just clearly showed you. Please explain away your truth using THAT GRAPHIC in this forum, which is a VERIFIED Q POST.

>>35712

It's in all movies anon. Just a lot subtler in many cases.

>>35718

FPGAs are fucking easy to program.

>>35720

Well aware the sign just passed. I don't know what's going to happen, but I would wager you don't know any more than I do, so buckle up.

>>35728

Now this is a clock we can wind. We do not even have CLOSE to enough Q / POTUS timestamps to wind up a clock. Trust me, I, as clock anon, found [4] on the day of.. but they all ended up being POTUS deltas not Q deltas, as we ORIGINALLY, ERRONEOUSLY SUSPECTED.

I was working on this, determined the collective error, told people but the fucking ECHO CHAMBER is strong.

>>35743

>>35606

This is a Q post, stating all deltas are POTUS tweets, or deltas between POTUS tweets/edits.

Please explain how this works with your erroneous assessment.

>>35774

Great! Wind it up. Show me the recent Q posts correlating. Go for it!

>>35787

There were absolutely delta markers between Trump tweets that correlated

>>35798

>>35803

>>35812

>>35813

GREAT NOW READ MINE.

>>35823

I agree. POTUS to POTUS.

>>35833

No, we just have an echo chamber of people who think they know what's up, ignoring all evidence to the contrary as it's inconvenient.

>>35834

Go ahead dude. I did the rest.

>>35840

Since that's literally the job Q requested, yes. Go put a list together.

>>35839

Exactly. I did all those original Q/Trump clocks, and when i did this one, I realized the correlation was more likely between TRUMP POSTS than Q/Trump (which also aligned!)