>>3515124

Related to this crackdown in SA is the subject of historicity of the origins of Islam.

Did Mecca exist as portrayed in the near-universal tradition of modern Islam? No, it did not exit in the time of Mohammed's purported rise as a religious and political leader.

Did "The Prophet" exist as portrayed in that same tradition? No.

Is Islam derivative of other religions and, as such, not as portrayed in that same tradition? Correct.

The underlying problem with Islam itself is its deceit of millions over the centuries. When one examines its origins and its development, there are striking parallels with the "playbook" of our domestic adversaries.

Anons become aware of these features of Islam that are of a theme with what we have called gloabalism, the cabal, and deep state.

The puzzle pieces begin to fit too neatly to be coincidental. Have big players taken lessons from Islam? Or vice versa? Or is it mutual power mongering that brings together the strings in common?

Systematically political. Organically based in human nature's weaknesses, yes, but refined and synthetically syncretistic across place and time. Moreso than other religious and/or cult phenomena, including communism as per adaptations of ChiComs.

>>3516642

>>3517146

Thankq, Anon.

The concept of moral authority to lie, not merely expediency, is one of the common threads.

Another is reframing or manipulation of the narrative to suit the moment. As sophisticated and modern as we might think of our own political flora and fauna, this basic tactic was used at the core of the Islamic rise to power from the very beginning. See syncretism. See projection.

Astonishingly, at least for public consumption, Q has reminded us to Think Mirror. Indeed, apostates?

>>3517285

The point is the underlying ways and means. It is well worth paying more attention, Anon, to what that entails.

Observe and dig, if you will.

If not, look away and carry on as dismissively as you feel necessary, of course.

Allspeed, Anon.