>>3516667

I will do that. This old Q post is why I'm so interested in the misspellings and surprised that there isn't a well understood decode method yet.

I'm just genuinely curious about the coded messages. There's no way those misspellings are an accident.

I suspect that President Trump and Q are showing us this coded messaging technique because it's what the bad guys used to communicate and we "have more than we know" because they used the technique in the open, which would mean that we could review old tweets, new articles, wiki leaks, etc. and know what they were doing.

I appreciate your time.

>>3517124

That's a good explanation and analysis.

It seems like the reason for the tweets/posts are mostly about confirmation of Q/POTUS link for anons. And a little bit of additional pointing in the right direction or hinting.

Have you seen any other theories on the purpose of the coded communications?