>Q never mentioned fuck all about 9/11.
>retweets Kamala Harris
that's just a ridiculous standard to judge by. this anon retweets per the message rather than the messenger. that doesn't mean that i agree with everything that the person i've retweeted stands for, nor does it imply support of said person. if you're going to do some fault-finding, find real faults.
that said, i did read the two breads where collageanon went off the rails, doxxed himself & ate up bread. if you feel reason to go after him still, go for it, yet,again, be reasonable a retweet is not necessarily an endorsement, just as a notable here is not necessarily an endorsement
Stalled? No. Diluted? Yes. What did you expect once we went mainstream? Others were bound to dilute the overall movement coming in with their own agendas, increase in attacks/shilling, people who are still catching on & don't yet understand, less reading of the drops, etc, yet, not one single Q drop has lost value. And the plan is still in motion. So, no, not stalled. The state of /QR/ does not necessarily reflect the state of the movement overall. Same way that MSM does not necessarily reflect the state of the USA overall.
How do you know that James hasn't been cooperating with & feeding info to authorities "behind the scenes"? Not everyone posts their every thought on twitter, if that's what you're expecting.
Let's use the proper term here: informant. And why are you looking for a star to be a hero? What's your malfunction? Take your heroic ass out to HW & do it, if you "feel" that James isn't doing it for you. Meanwhile, back up your theories with sauce, or we will all just keel dancing in the land of speculation. Burden of proof is on the accuser, that means you.
Patriots don't attack patriots. The motivations of said James Woods' hater is clear
>Harvard is for white students, no the Chinese or Vietnamese or Japanese what have you.
Are we going back to "Whites Only" signs next?