>>3521219>>
The Saudis are "in custody" of two holy sites. Odd choice of word…
>The Saudis are "in custody" of two holy sites. Odd choice of word…
Point, but I don't recall a SoS using that exact terminology before. But I'm willing to be wrong…
>>3521219>>
The Saudis are "in custody" of two holy sites. Odd choice of word…
>The Saudis are "in custody" of two holy sites. Odd choice of word…
Point, but I don't recall a SoS using that exact terminology before. But I'm willing to be wrong…