>>3524033 (lb)

It’s all a complete confidence trick. All of these businesses that seek to manipulate and control the populace were developed under the aegis of DARPA and then laundered into the public domain as supposedly the start ups of brilliant tech entrepreneurs.

Two questions: how were the beneficiaries of this largesse selected (I think we can guess, but we’ve too little real info on the backgrounds of Zuckerberg, Brin, Page, Musk, Dorsey & co)? And how much of the stock in their companies do they REALLY own (the behind the scenes cash movements should be of great interest to an honest SEC)?

>>3524658

And how are they communicating to organize the response, if all comms cut and/or monitored?

>>3524754

One’s dead. The other’s Anderson Pooper. No sensitivity necessary.

>>3524795

And CARAVANS

>>3524898

That might be the case, but it is not your place to condemn:

How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is a log in your own eye? (Matt 7:4)

>>3525023

The issue, as I see it, is how technology is developed in secret (and with a sinister an unconstitutional intent) on the back of public money, but finds its way into the mainstream to benefit certain “anointed” individuals (and others behind the scenes).

The crimes and breaches of duty inherent in these cases are legion.

>>3525016

Didn’t they change the name to Sammich?

>>3525115

She could bring me to order. And bring me a triple-decker.