How are we supposed to do research on pre-flood civilizations? Should we deffer to Plato's nebulous description that was written 9000 years after this flood supposedly happened? Or should I wade through the works of people like Eric Von Daniken, Micheal Tellinger, and Sitchen and hope that they aren't lying?
I do know that David Icke, the number one proponent of the repitllian meme sells repackaged Theosophical propaganda:
https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSGfNp___5o
I do know that the "Ancient Aliens" theory is widely promoted on the history channel, and many of its claims are outright lies
https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9w-i5oZqaQ
I do know that social scientists have been studying people who believe in alien cults and channelers as far back as the 1970s (See Influence Chapter 4: Commitment and Consistency by Robert Cialdini). It's not a large leap of logic to infer that intelligence agencies, that are obsessed with controlling the mind, would promulgate crazy ideas in the course of their experiments.
The onus of proof is on the proponents of this theory to put forth the evidence that this is actually real. Go ahead and put forth your books,